Re: [Cfrg] draft-irtf-cfrg-eddsa -- one final proposal for domain separation (context labels) for ed25519

Richard Outerbridge <outer@interlog.com> Sat, 21 May 2016 16:27 UTC

Return-Path: <outer@interlog.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E970D12D120 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 May 2016 09:27:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dvPiPy1aZ3gA for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 May 2016 09:27:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-1.ca.inter.net (mail-1.ca.inter.net [208.85.220.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADCB0127058 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 21 May 2016 09:27:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (offload-3.ca.inter.net [208.85.220.70]) by mail-1.ca.inter.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC3F313641; Sat, 21 May 2016 12:27:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail-1.ca.inter.net ([208.85.220.69]) by localhost (offload-3.ca.inter.net [208.85.220.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UBaRYPG6BHaw; Sat, 21 May 2016 12:27:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.168.61] (TOROON0246W-LP140-02-1176216692.dsl.bell.ca [70.27.164.116]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: outer@interlog.com) by mail-1.ca.inter.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04B1131BAEC; Sat, 21 May 2016 12:27:40 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Richard Outerbridge <outer@interlog.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160521135744.10784.qmail@cr.yp.to>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 12:27:40 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AD2B974C-3945-4984-A020-693975C86246@interlog.com>
References: <20160521135744.10784.qmail@cr.yp.to>
To: "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/1NL83-sUm0BJZjFnLYXLxiLb4kw>
Resent-From: alias-bounces@ietf.org
Resent-To: <>
Cc: cfrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] draft-irtf-cfrg-eddsa -- one final proposal for domain separation (context labels) for ed25519
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 16:27:46 -0000

> On 2016-05-21 (142), at 09:57:44, D. J. Bernstein <djb@cr.yp.to> wrote:
> 
> Bryan Ford writes:

So, in general, I gather, you’re saying that added complexity is not
simply strictly unnecessary but actually dangerous?  Go figure!
__outer