[CFRG] Re: RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-aead-limits

[Eric Rescorla <[e-mail]>]

This document is clear and useful and I believe CFRG should publish it.

I have not double checked the formulae, but as I understand it, the authors
have done so and solicited sufficient external review.

-Ekr


On Sat, Feb 28, 2026 at 8:12 AM Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Dear CFRG,
>
> We haven't received any comments during this RGLC extension.
>
> Please comment if you have read the document, especially the most recent
> version draft-irtf-cfrg-aead-limits-11.
>
> Best regards,
> Stanislav (for chairs)
>
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 10:33 AM Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear CFRG,
>>
>> The authors of draft-irtf-cfrg-aead-limits have addressed the concerns
>> raised during the RGLC (see
>> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-irtf-cfrg-aead-limits-09&url2=draft-irtf-cfrg-aead-limits-11&difftype=--html
>> ).
>>
>> We didn't finish the RGLC last time, so we are now formally extending the
>> RGLC: it will end on February 28th.
>>
>> We got a review of the draft from Thomas Pornin (on behalf of the Crypto
>> Review Panel):
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/crypto-panel/AKkf4W6n_JgDlvHlOdQphb932jQ/
>> The comments were addressed in version -09 of the draft.
>>
>> If you've read the document and think that it is ready (or not ready) for
>> publication as an RFC, please send a message in reply to this email or
>> directly to CFRG chairs ([e-mail]) If you have detailed
>> comments, these would also be very helpful at this point.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Stanislav (for CFRG chairs)
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 2:52 PM Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <
>> [e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear CFRG participants,
>>>
>>> This message is starting a 3-week RGLC on
>>> draft-irtf-cfrg-aead-limits-09 ("Usage Limits on AEAD Algorithms") that
>>> will end on February 3rd 2025. If you've read the document and think that
>>> it is ready (or not ready) for publication as an RFC, please send a message
>>> in reply to this email or directly to CFRG chairs ([e-mail])
>>> If you have detailed comments, these would also be very helpful at this
>>> point.
>>>
>>> We've got a review of the draft from Thomas Pornin (on behalf of the
>>> Crypto Review Panel):
>>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/crypto-panel/AKkf4W6n_JgDlvHlOdQphb932jQ/
>>> The comments were addressed in version -09 of the draft.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Stanislav, for CFRG chairs
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
> CFRG mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>