[CFRG] Is it appropriate for an RFC to mention specific projects or companies?
Christopher Patton <cpatton@cloudflare.com> Thu, 01 August 2024 20:07 UTC
Return-Path: <cpatton@cloudflare.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3DCC15106C for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2024 13:07:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cloudflare.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l3VN2Lz9eErq for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2024 13:07:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22d.google.com (mail-oi1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4BEDC14F6EC for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 1 Aug 2024 13:07:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3db23a60850so3909296b6e.0 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 01 Aug 2024 13:07:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudflare.com; s=google09082023; t=1722542857; x=1723147657; darn=irtf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=KyybEBWBWlM4AkwuFsRsATmSQ0GOYyeLAL8hxi7maSU=; b=JoYY07is6eTGLJMhZcWBn2BCsrmajyKwnkcdz8xETkTRKt1pPET30d+PFq7e9KVjx9 UV8EuFbkZGDwCuM4VMeKajThUhRZfC8SZTYzzfOfm94rH3O9FSEGmV8MKIdXO0CjC7JV IDS5UFCc+kvkxJZTiBih2JhmJSEYHmcjOcH6iGDKT249hgXeehwNyVFHp5uGpei6T7BG xFIDZLIF5obG7jYQopoehRC5UCzFq/3QCN6wTrg7WJgzcqdlUl20AlKAbnqB2Gd3mCk4 1w4R1Mrz8TZjXrTfWdVF/CTiv0Y4LQhhy05TabQyDk8DZFjHihAJMPPWvXfnZK0UPQLr a16A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1722542857; x=1723147657; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=KyybEBWBWlM4AkwuFsRsATmSQ0GOYyeLAL8hxi7maSU=; b=tfOu75KgR2Il8dyyovlIMM2hfOItMLBExvhq/y0fVxf/XWMa1WrSaX8fZMyvomWZla Irk4lvCzOfDfBfOgZVfETisitzTc3H4qzw6PrrL3wkNdn2aILfkcQpopXoedJno6pDbO FVb4UfPpgGFpGiTr8pzFv1oeFduF2QlYi8TDksHXAM6p2atci2OERgkj5mZ0DRVJO/I0 MDct3Xh5sOE/tKMgQ0n7+QUoWM6gPzeNeVpVgU36sqTT+jhxQGK+DWu0MXEL+dejdGg4 b198WKJJdO28c2E2I7qxAI03VMEczRXwWpIzVtOWpsS5D/jyBjVkj2n5fRXTHkT8Ye+v M6qQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzYB5hjOdsija53lP81BI7/DyJu9bmGEBxsb3O9dj1gY991CTIV TTlMzAc2K64QQ1Xc19cQT8v8jSvrDLYT+Du2roB3ho8F31AJdlEjfxvEzx/hKgWm0rPSbfsDChu JQV7IDAzj9dfLWLpqHz+FKLyB3W+fRjW6A5e32vbdi+aQE9bVF9s=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEN3gZJ/S+Vtu4PMiMHiZJruVoaXCYCG9Iqz+My/LJ21swpV86ZgqYz+Yc6aWfnhuR0b0pybi5r0rzPny1C+8g=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1b07:b0:3db:27dc:d554 with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3db55816391mr1364958b6e.27.1722542857508; Thu, 01 Aug 2024 13:07:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Christopher Patton <cpatton@cloudflare.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2024 13:07:26 -0700
Message-ID: <CAG2Zi22KO6=mDwbKHMvmh+DYkEqNbtBcGO==cNC2c_pcV1xwtg@mail.gmail.com>
To: CFRG <cfrg@irtf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000021fba1061ea4c31b"
Message-ID-Hash: XFEWGZB6VWSGBFAGGRQSBZF4ZC2LAF6T
X-Message-ID-Hash: XFEWGZB6VWSGBFAGGRQSBZF4ZC2LAF6T
X-MailFrom: cpatton@cloudflare.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-cfrg.irtf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [CFRG] Is it appropriate for an RFC to mention specific projects or companies?
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/4TAP3_bgDGFEy8C29qigQUwNc2A>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:cfrg-owner@irtf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cfrg-join@irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cfrg-leave@irtf.org>
Hi all, I'm looking for advice on how to close this open issue for draft-irtf-cfrg-vdaf: https://github.com/cfrg/draft-irtf-cfrg-vdaf/issues/338 We currently mention a couple projects that motivated us to write down these algorithms. Are there any guidelines at IRTF or IETF that can help us figure out if this is appropriate? Thanks, Chris P.
- [CFRG] Is it appropriate for an RFC to mention sp… Christopher Patton
- [CFRG] Re: Is it appropriate for an RFC to mentio… Michael StJohns
- [CFRG] Re: Is it appropriate for an RFC to mentio… Watson Ladd
- [CFRG] Re: Is it appropriate for an RFC to mentio… Antonio Sanso
- [CFRG] Re: Is it appropriate for an RFC to mentio… Christopher Patton
- [CFRG] Re: Is it appropriate for an RFC to mentio… Christopher Patton