Re: [CFRG] Bitcoin delenda est. Was: Escalation: time commitment to fix *production* security bugs for BLS RFC v4?

Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org> Mon, 26 April 2021 18:39 UTC

Return-Path: <krose@krose.org>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21D23A2C4F for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 11:39:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=krose.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7NpjZ_-FzymG for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 11:39:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb33.google.com (mail-yb1-xb33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27CC83A2C4E for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 11:39:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb33.google.com with SMTP id p3so45472244ybk.0 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 11:38:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=krose.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ruYahflBbK9B2fV9Ln34JL+PCJF651gVD9XNqA8bGHk=; b=gBH6/C3Ddx188byav7nPiKSrSjtIrtM7AOLg8tXXLVernRHs9UacaRzUx9NPHIjeZ0 ehR5jL8rTGtLabuia4QWnUbkEinExaYogel7XsFVQgpnODRHGufEuq7FI53Xhzd7xB5X q/BHFDZAq3b+OBANGBQmQKIcV1apQE8P0Esn8=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ruYahflBbK9B2fV9Ln34JL+PCJF651gVD9XNqA8bGHk=; b=Jdrm7Qbncyj/w6fcclEHioICfA6n2rc8N0wC5/w0Dghk4BSGXwYX8mNmS27NEI/rv2 onh+8yasBeDxQLbK+3FVzjgREqm9hlfYjYzycqngewydafYjWOABVZuwM0tBhm0saFvS usE9xWOJz/WZsNl8mfVFXsOg5RzY6PufK0RAA/SsKMK3N+GeNgvjpKwJKz5XM4mNZiOT lvIU3A3rtI2jDT9WigvuSiIuOlLICUWap9/qFCTFH2IsUOBa5arOV1AexBfwirXUB4Du Q62NhrypzHAatPqZ9VAFvXN2VJCG72ebC40xV6m75acVjP22sHDzvLRdInidaPhYqEcd 6X3g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533JdZGY2femfOpOedL3neHc3xBbVVSAhDGGTHEC6lTlSI+emqEg uiZOu8QN5G7oeUzwCCSdZopiH+sg+DRzrCb4LdmnNQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwOezL8HCi0w88+Qjc1V5ovIl6b8jjP0DWRtRVw/oAi2v1f4vcQWR8jsmWME5A/12yvAc1hFYly+9ToEfsOkFM=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:c941:: with SMTP id z62mr26165811ybf.130.1619462338648; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 11:38:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAAEB6g=tU=MF1_QKduEN55ft0rWe+7x0wBbywS083fJrjzP=XA@mail.gmail.com> <20210423195504.d6f74x4jsdrzagcc@muon> <CAAEB6g=dcsRKz6zm7F15F-uZ7Zfi_qF06KwQXmrireKEKZYHFg@mail.gmail.com> <49ca86ec6409217d60e3f2e94e3090ef2b571f80.camel@loup-vaillant.fr> <A1765592-7AF7-4F3A-8B22-C5BD6C059A7C@akamai.com> <CAMm+LwjKV3xT_2StxzL4X3BCeTpvwJBMmFMLQUw66xhQNkDNZA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJU8_nVwtK2d6ofHGM+G+HvAhNQyx1VqmxYzXampCcJJ1ymZ6Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAHu1Y735eSMTA2agZJ7VX=38CQ-e5yqkA9_50uEZ67o=XdSgKA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHu1Y735eSMTA2agZJ7VX=38CQ-e5yqkA9_50uEZ67o=XdSgKA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 14:38:47 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJU8_nW+Tzph6ko1hJ0qCuii_qu-n+gEmv+Toz_37NeFxk7oGA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com>
Cc: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006c303a05c0e475b6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/5bCgNRLoybIkCMVHKrx3lwuVojg>
Subject: Re: [CFRG] Bitcoin delenda est. Was: Escalation: time commitment to fix *production* security bugs for BLS RFC v4?
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 18:39:06 -0000

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 2:29 PM Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> wrote:

>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 11:03 AM Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 1:29 PM Phillip Hallam-Baker <
>> phill@hallambaker.com> wrote:
>>
>>> As a human being living on a planet threatened by environmental damage
>>> from CO2 emissions, I am strongly opposed to any IETF work to support any
>>> form of purported 'cryptocurrency' that relies on any form of 'proof of
>>> work' or 'proof of waste'.
>>>
>>> The electricity requirements of cryptocurrencies have been larger than
>>> that of entire countries. This is an experiment that it is time to stop.
>>>
>>
>> This massively overstates the impact of mining.
>>
>
> A single bitcoin transaction uses over 700 kW-h of energy – equivalent to
> the power consumed by an average U.S. household over 24 days.  Do you
> claim otherwise?
>

I claim the numbers I referenced (with sources) in my email.

Kyle