Re: [Cfrg] How rigid is rigid enough?
David Leon Gil <coruus@gmail.com> Sat, 10 January 2015 07:29 UTC
Return-Path: <coruus@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B6BF1A002A for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 23:29:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eU3cFuqPhBy3 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 23:29:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x231.google.com (mail-ig0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01A001A802E for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 23:29:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f177.google.com with SMTP id z20so5213146igj.4 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 23:29:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=QBUTXYeaWfkkIU9hQ+/AoSbprtTicBY+pkKFjUEUBkc=; b=Mhdp/Ad4Ok4uA9HFfXT/hEa4k8HAnmoX7Gphfjlfh3x7crxo7kGXExo3ZNbO05fJwB tG7oMoRnIg6sktNuZIHWRzjNJymZl9ah2lWMBfu0kiC5CE6B892H/nTgIPKeqtXPhkdg mO68qgMkBTvw/HOW/TNW5OYGBZRbnDtkkRsg4Sl4YpYSrPCOB4rTLTwCvh/PKMVZgb26 /D+VGJSddkbSElUJGJTfgokIwTi30cZDXKsJj9CwiYDCw5kpS5tc4pP93ZHySFh+F5BX cYh2hW7AJsE5REWwvF3dlGwerHKbqEyBkNXJRuU49TFcxbpNeL/HU6hvndV16hyfC2xn SF7w==
X-Received: by 10.42.12.147 with SMTP id y19mr16307597icy.80.1420874976135; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 23:29:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.132.211 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 23:29:15 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAA7UWsVi+TszTYxKd4KSGYNryV24Bq+0FpxN2GO5LWA5khdqjg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA7UWsVi+TszTYxKd4KSGYNryV24Bq+0FpxN2GO5LWA5khdqjg@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Leon Gil <coruus@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 23:29:15 -0800
Message-ID: <CAA7UWsWm9iPyFuWeahXsSQfbYY4Ahb7j_k4BveuRxidNGbf2sA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/5lZ74cJr0O5mUoKto-MhNy7Pxa0>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] How rigid is rigid enough?
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 07:29:38 -0000
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 10:49 PM, David Leon Gil <coruus@gmail.com> wrote: > 2^389 - 21 == 3 mod 4 C389 (wl) And, to correct the record: 2^389 - 21 should be attributed to Watson Ladd. Robert Ransom has been perhaps its most vocal critic. (As he has noted, it would be painful to implement.)
- [Cfrg] How rigid is rigid enough? David Leon Gil
- Re: [Cfrg] How rigid is rigid enough? David Leon Gil