IETF Logo Mail Archive

[CFRG] Re: IRTF Chair review of draft-irtf-cfrg-opaque-16

stef <f3o09vld@ctrlc.hu> Tue, 24 September 2024 15:25 UTC

Return-Path: <f3o09vld@ctrlc.hu>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11717C1D5300 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 08:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zZhEOME9DTaQ for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 08:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ctrlc.hu (ctrlc.hu [185.193.126.105]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33CB4C180B5A for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 08:24:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from x2.ctrlc.hu (unknown [10.23.5.25]) by ctrlc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE71219469DE; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 15:24:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by x2.ctrlc.hu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CBE198E6; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 15:23:46 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 17:23:46 +0200
From: stef <f3o09vld@ctrlc.hu>
To: Kevin Lewi <lewi.kevin.k@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ZvLZgq04KvGTYyOL@localhost>
References: <ED4B24C7-4D93-4F17-B5CC-2AE1F818A2E5@csperkins.org> <CACitvs_pyBPqZ7R0MXdpKJue6S-5XSxXmhFihpe7ewpb+BX3sQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACitvs_pyBPqZ7R0MXdpKJue6S-5XSxXmhFihpe7ewpb+BX3sQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID-Hash: Q73FC5D642MUNNCGZAZRBLCAD2HCRVK6
X-Message-ID-Hash: Q73FC5D642MUNNCGZAZRBLCAD2HCRVK6
X-MailFrom: f3o09vld@ctrlc.hu
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-cfrg.irtf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>, draft-irtf-cfrg-opaque@ietf.org, cfrg-chairs@ietf.org, cfrg <cfrg@irtf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [CFRG] Re: IRTF Chair review of draft-irtf-cfrg-opaque-16
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/7EnGfGnWMw6i0UdWc14qwgPHSGM>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:cfrg-owner@irtf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cfrg-join@irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cfrg-leave@irtf.org>

On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 09:54:36PM -0700, Kevin Lewi wrote:
> > Finally, I note that the appendices contain a number of test vectors. Has
> the latest version of the draft been verified against a reference
> implementation to ensure these are correct?
> 
> Yes, the test vectors in the latest version of the draft have been verified
> in the following implementations: https://github.com/cloudflare/opaque-ts,
> and https://github.com/facebook/opaque-ke . There are other implementations
> which might also be up-to-date with the latest version, but I have not
> confirmed: https://github.com/stef/libopaque,

as the author of libopaque i confirm the testvectors of the variant
implemented in libopaque match those in
https://github.com/cfrg/draft-irtf-cfrg-opaque/blob/master/poc/vectors/vectors.json

v2.40.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status