Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG document
Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 15 December 2014 11:16 UTC
Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB751A1B0D for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 03:16:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6gdSeSAwQGQT for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 03:16:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22b.google.com (mail-wi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFFBB1A1B0B for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 03:16:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id bs8so8476447wib.10 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 03:16:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=j/R2ywGy1rCvgnsB9cRxpWOP9XyCbKIVztngHmZu4wo=; b=ChpTGJ1i11DV3ciKItT/SNJrjxhv5ps0AZC+4WmaEaqyc4leIw4Q5EgDqQ2ozluBBG +LmWTX1KImNMPmDGNpNwfLBhRro9KAR+EkiGjPqfABEVGiTNgcNqU8VYdSgnHBsZPddv M8dIgz2NYWMYw6KDlhTek5nPZRr4iMw8OkqeZzd5fbf1MUsOAk3VN2orHtFXBlqVRxVN zjVQzLdokPTB90XWIKXPp6Ri5eeehltdf4I4Mek2CMYOeeoYqHDxsZgUv3HQCdF3DM+K lFXnCaeHeJy3N2UtaETj+hTn038Gck68lRwWPH/Vhrqk2ys3C6F7W3KntYScLWr6WDAI Bsvg==
X-Received: by 10.180.107.198 with SMTP id he6mr30877033wib.44.1418642185459; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 03:16:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.24.248.241] (dyn32-131.checkpoint.com. [194.29.32.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wa5sm12648184wjc.8.2014.12.15.03.16.24 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Dec 2014 03:16:24 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_20693C49-9C6A-4E66-A725-EC6260BC9EEF"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BF9DADF6-003F-454D-8E96-4A28A060CA72@isode.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:16:22 +0200
Message-Id: <A635D82B-B55C-4574-AB73-D0408853D642@gmail.com>
References: <BF9DADF6-003F-454D-8E96-4A28A060CA72@isode.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/7Uk5aHBx_t03ejn_Aqh3SUSMPXE
Cc: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG document
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:16:29 -0000
> On Dec 14, 2014, at 6:41 PM, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote: > > Hi, > This message starts 3 weeks adoption call for draft-ladd-spake2. Please reply to this message or directly to CFRG chairs, stating one of the following > > 1) that you are happy to adopt the draft as a starting point > 2) that you are not happy to adopt this draft > or > 3) that you think the document needs more work before the RG should consider adopting it > > While detailed document reviews are generally welcome, this not a call to provide detailed comments on the document. Definitely not (3), as I think the document is in fine enough a shape to be adopted, despite it needing a lot of work. But I would really like to know who needs a PAKE right now. PAKEs require the server to store the cleartext password or a password equivalent, creating a security issue that is potentially worse than sending cleartext passwords through authenticated channels (as in form-based or basic authentication to a TLS-protected server) So, yes, there’s a framework for PAKEs in IKE, and one can be created for TLS, and an EAP method with a PAKE could also be used in a number of places, but all those things get little use. So without comparing the merits of SPAKE2 to the previous PAKE that got discussed in this working group, who is the “customer” for any PAKE? Yoav
- [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG docu… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG … Rene Struik
- Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG … Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG … Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG … David Leon Gil
- Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG … Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG … Yoav Nir
- Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG … Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG … Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG … Michael Hamburg
- Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG … Dan Harkins
- Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG … Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG … Dan Harkins
- Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG … Derek Atkins
- Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG … Dan Harkins
- Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG … Andy Lutomirski
- Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG … Paul Lambert
- Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG … Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG … Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG … Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG … Dan Harkins
- Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG … Paul Lambert
- Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG … Tom Yu
- Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG … Andy Lutomirski
- Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG … Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Alyssa Rowan
- Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG … Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG … Adam Langley
- Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG … Paul Lambert
- [Cfrg] On the topic of the SPAKE2 draft Paul Lambert
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Dan Harkins
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Salz, Rich
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Dan Harkins
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Dan Harkins
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Mike Hamburg
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Salz, Rich
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Andrey Jivsov
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian Alyssa Rowan
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Salz, Rich
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Damien Miller
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Dan Harkins
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Mike Hamburg
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Yoav Nir
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian Michael Clark