Re: [Cfrg] Call for adoption: Threshold Signatures

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Thu, 08 October 2020 16:55 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EACA3A0E72 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 09:55:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.623
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.623 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.274, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ffdZvjXIC6rQ for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 09:55:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97E893A0F80 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 09:55:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.32.60.136] (76-209-242-70.lightspeed.mtryca.sbcglobal.net [76.209.242.70]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 098GrTMG034445 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Oct 2020 09:53:29 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 76-209-242-70.lightspeed.mtryca.sbcglobal.net [76.209.242.70] claimed to be [10.32.60.136]
From: "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: "Nick Sullivan" <nick@cloudflare.com>
Cc: cfrg@irtf.org
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2020 09:55:36 -0700
X-Mailer: MailMate Trial (1.13.2r5673)
Message-ID: <7B47F0DD-17BD-4B8E-A99D-223604DA0245@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAFDDyk_U_HPS+Mmn4jnBqMUkAzpsB9r1VS4iWeVJYwKRUsUV0g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFDDyk_U_HPS+Mmn4jnBqMUkAzpsB9r1VS4iWeVJYwKRUsUV0g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/7iH0dibkauVTlcYnwbtAmDKJBB4>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Call for adoption: Threshold Signatures
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2020 16:55:46 -0000

Any work the CFRG does on describing threshold signatures should 
probably also incorporate work being done elsewhere. For example, US 
NIST has a major work item on standardizing such methods:
    https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/nistir/8214a/final