Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG document)
Alyssa Rowan <akr@akr.io> Mon, 26 January 2015 11:07 UTC
Return-Path: <akr@akr.io>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 604301A88E4 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 03:07:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9UQN38B1mTbC for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 03:07:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from entima.net (entima.net [78.129.143.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE3C81A88B1 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 03:07:04 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54C61FE2.3010309@akr.io>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 11:07:14 +0000
From: Alyssa Rowan <akr@akr.io>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
References: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73AAF65EBB@uxcn10-tdc05.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> <54C619EB.40807@akr.io>
In-Reply-To: <54C619EB.40807@akr.io>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/9TcF4tkn18uqjDHaY8Zd2Zh_qgc>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG document)
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 11:07:06 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 26/01/2015 10:41, Alyssa Rowan wrote: > GnuPG and SSH folks are using 25519's native big-endian formats. Um, I mean little-endian there. Clearly I need more tea. <g> - -- /akr -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUxh/hAAoJEOyEjtkWi2t6uMEQAKrKFVitH5iyKuGARob/znF0 AhpzsCwkAci6YgbeUmSjR+2tzVrVsyGwdWFoVVoXlyeo+8FYbLMzQkdDT2Nm0TE2 GTOQBoyHyKNxei8MKSodhTm5CgY2ux+s/5qDdmSWVwW4OLABqsvVt/7lEu0YErPW AM9nPDU0r1leVF3nNprkMaCnylKU9qYV92D1z6EV/iDdGmCgoISTHawdYs5rm6oG enLG+r8+r2KyfvaxkbMfQzr4gX1saiUHK++5aNX0yUGhSM+OHRsd6m2xDqixWuxU cr+XGJRBmibuDoMp0GXTOFT87LhKiZHfjCo7krLXsrrWU7a4NaHc4Jzl4xI5ByRB s6DUUoI/wlnF4ZSTmeDekamHm//WwkHYUbeqWDLANNiSHaWEhYDaIwcgF93klT50 PtXT6BnEE1gAm8d6GAS56AFDvB2iEOF+VRWLodAMmR4MwzNlu/O4RKIGN1RGtGOl tr4W99goEq6wK+x5pTtRWW3WtyosN+elOTexH5i766K7NrFgYvCbxP6uvCYEc/Iv kO/LXwOFcSum1BVWgsa5vN0SAWiJMor/NWJnA8++ZXFBTv3k5ovH67cgA6mxUZQq P5JkDswbbf0WQeC598TVTw+c6FZObJcp/n2mBi7hqAQyQpW7F//7E3+M8PblBv3W CjOZorFOtfbCsnXgIc9w =MrcU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Dan Brown
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Peter Gutmann
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Alyssa Rowan
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Alyssa Rowan
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Michael Clark
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Michael Clark
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Michael Clark
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Peter Gutmann
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Peter Gutmann
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Alyssa Rowan
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Peter Gutmann
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Salz, Rich
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian Derek Atkins
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian Salz, Rich
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian Derek Atkins
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian Derek Atkins
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian Blumenthal, Uri - 0558 - MITLL
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Dan Harkins
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Andy Lutomirski
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Dan Harkins
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian Tony Arcieri
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Michael Clark
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian Damien Miller
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Dan Harkins
- Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian (was: Adoption of … Watson Ladd