Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG document

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Mon, 05 January 2015 20:26 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE141A1BAA for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 12:26:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q2BjkysM7Rcl for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 12:25:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from waldorf.isode.com (ext-bt.isode.com [217.34.220.158]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D64DB1A899E for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 12:21:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1420489290; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=EtxDQj05SPulSCeJ3sUSz5s5Rn0nCSdJl40vLEt2J/0=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=jKG89fe9xC+oyn/O9IxPE4SCd/QAiRfr8gR1s5a1W6hAKYkwiwQhpDCHpwyhudBFQB/mQc ZN7pJXD9/fZJnQtjVI5bPPszUX5sqY/qAss2lA/gxG6FHLthUfSp1lEzvNsIKXsMoWf7Pz w0qeNDh05vf5q+idoljqLm2UUF6pwk0=;
Received: from [192.168.0.5] (cpc5-nmal20-2-0-cust24.19-2.cable.virginm.net [92.234.84.25]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <VKrySAAKaJXM@waldorf.isode.com>; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 20:21:29 +0000
Message-ID: <54AAF24B.1020306@isode.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 20:21:31 +0000
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
To: Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>
References: <BF9DADF6-003F-454D-8E96-4A28A060CA72@isode.com> <cc1a22e2ad7758b65dcadf70f816fc66.squirrel@www.trepanning.net>
In-Reply-To: <cc1a22e2ad7758b65dcadf70f816fc66.squirrel@www.trepanning.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/9VJirWJCIjkT0QQJznnUBzx2GyQ
Cc: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG document
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 20:26:01 -0000

On 15/12/2014 18:19, Dan Harkins wrote:
> I'm in favor of another PAKE being documented but I'm not sure
> why SPAKE2 is the one.
I was asking about documenting SPAKE2. There is currently no intent in 
declaring it to be "the one". And if chairs decide to investigate 
declaring it the one, there would be another consensus call on the 
mailing list.