[Cfrg] draft-ladd-safecurves-02

Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Fri, 10 January 2014 19:11 UTC

Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B36531AE12E for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 11:11:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vm3HC6wU4IpU for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 11:11:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x229.google.com (mail-we0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED97B1AE1C3 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 11:11:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id u57so4341792wes.14 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 11:11:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=YHu7CYt5GILj/MmhS/E20j0m706OP0MF59C0Epj/UBE=; b=thB8vqMR8lscGc2xstTZm0PuQqwn6gN3uaNNFVsorST5qidL+sa1hMopan/M6Hrj08 wmqpq8NhMLBrVfZO+qFFm2nL38ePRve7gJfj6Jig/BwhAKR7g64juLhPf+W7nrWJIzSv PJxqwJzjEXAVb8FLRMCY7ZcSF24KfeZIBCt+dBLQcoPNiP6UaEwpVkpI5k/LrY3JfOSb C+W/KdeMjb2MIHPc9ilGhSYYCLk+kAxbpvOqPitqYoHhQvA6vW2TzLI/MRE0UotuTW3r RevTEHUsKzSizMBc6ujrFc8FmXBzltUZxWsk17n93q5exPYv/KhNqg6/6LWCcEFxSynN cHUQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.189.132 with SMTP id gi4mr10142046wjc.5.1389381079577; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 11:11:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.242.131 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 11:11:19 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 11:11:19 -0800
Message-ID: <CACsn0c=uuzsH3Zd-tPEAMsxAbk-RpQEHpfbTh9gHJi5ggjT+qg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
To: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: [Cfrg] draft-ladd-safecurves-02
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 19:11:42 -0000

Added: explicit formulas and a point format (big endian with a bit for
the missing coordinate).
The name is now the Chicago curves.

I'ld like the conversation to focus on moving this through the
process, rather than on bikeshedding names or formats. Ambiguity and
errors should be the focus, as well as complaints that "well, there is
this paper of Diem..."

Sincerely,
Watson