MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CAG2Zi20N98cxpgjfRe6gWw1SQEoux+5P3NhLBFUfUHk_udYeFg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAG2Zi20N98cxpgjfRe6gWw1SQEoux+5P3NhLBFUfUHk_udYeFg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:09:30 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CACsn0cmLjjyxcKsiHio-Vu-8jo80FQ=aFtoO3GD69jC5kUig9A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christopher Patton <cpatton=40cloudflare.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a1fc54062282b10a"
Message-ID-Hash: BSUTLDSDYZDE2PNK2M4JZMI4KALZ5IAE
CC: CFRG <cfrg@irtf.org>
Precedence: list
Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BCFRG=5D_Re=3A_Where_should_test_vectors_live=3F?=
Archived-At: 
 <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/B8l3WmgXMiqq1yGe2-jcq5-6H_Q>

--000000000000a1fc54062282b10a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Sep 19, 2024, 5:18=E2=80=AFPM Christopher Patton <cpatton=3D
40cloudflare.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hi CFRG,
>
> It occurred to me today that our drafts often have human-friendly test
> vectors that look something like this:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9180#appendix-A.1.1
>
> These aren't super convenient for a machine. In theory you could write a
> script that downloads https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9180.txt and
> write a parser to pull out the test vectors, but does anyone really do
> this? Luckily for RFC 9180 we have a JSON version to work with instead:
>
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cfrg/draft-irtf-cfrg-hpke/refs/heads/ma=
ster/test-vectors.json
>
> How do folks feel about pointing to machine readable test vectors from an
> RFC in lieu of producing human-friendly, but machine-unfriendly in the
> appendix? Suppose for example an RFC had a pointer to a JSON blob somewhe=
re
> on datatracker. Is this feasible/desirable?
>

Why not in ignored elements (not sure how to do)in the XML source? This
might take some tools team input.

>
> Thanks,
> Chris P.
>
> _______________________________________________
> CFRG mailing list -- cfrg@irtf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to cfrg-leave@irtf.org
>

--000000000000a1fc54062282b10a
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"auto"><div><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" =
class=3D"gmail_attr">On Thu, Sep 19, 2024, 5:18=E2=80=AFPM Christopher Patt=
on &lt;cpatton=3D<a href=3D"mailto:40cloudflare.com@dmarc.ietf.org">40cloud=
flare.com@dmarc.ietf.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail=
_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204=
,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Hi CFRG,</div><div><br></div>=
<div>It occurred to me today that our drafts often have human-friendly test=
 vectors that look something like this:</div><div><a href=3D"https://datatr=
acker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9180#appendix-A.1.1" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"no=
referrer">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9180#appendix-A.1.1</a><=
/div><div><br></div><div>These aren&#39;t super convenient for a machine. I=
n theory you could write a script that downloads <a href=3D"https://www.rfc=
-editor.org/rfc/rfc9180.txt" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"noreferrer">https://w=
ww.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9180.txt</a> and write a parser to pull out the te=
st vectors, but does anyone really do this? Luckily for RFC 9180 we have a =
JSON version to work with instead:</div><div><a href=3D"https://raw.githubu=
sercontent.com/cfrg/draft-irtf-cfrg-hpke/refs/heads/master/test-vectors.jso=
n" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"noreferrer">https://raw.githubusercontent.com/c=
frg/draft-irtf-cfrg-hpke/refs/heads/master/test-vectors.json</a></div><div>=
<br></div><div>How do folks feel about pointing to machine readable test ve=
ctors from an RFC in lieu of producing human-friendly, but machine-unfriend=
ly in the appendix? Suppose for example an RFC had a pointer to a JSON blob=
 somewhere on datatracker. Is this feasible/desirable?</div></div></blockqu=
ote></div></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Why not in ig=
nored elements (not sure how to do)in the XML source? This might take some =
tools team input.</div><div dir=3D"auto"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockq=
uote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1p=
x solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><br></div>=
<div>Thanks,</div><div>Chris P.<br></div><br></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
CFRG mailing list -- <a href=3D"mailto:cfrg@irtf.org" target=3D"_blank" rel=
=3D"noreferrer">cfrg@irtf.org</a><br>
To unsubscribe send an email to <a href=3D"mailto:cfrg-leave@irtf.org" targ=
et=3D"_blank" rel=3D"noreferrer">cfrg-leave@irtf.org</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div></div>

--000000000000a1fc54062282b10a--