Re: [Cfrg] Second RGLC on "AES-GCM-SIV"

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Sat, 10 February 2018 12:43 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115B412D893 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 04:43:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id matQsTzLCKND for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 04:43:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from statler.isode.com (Statler.isode.com [62.232.206.189]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FCF1126BF0 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 04:43:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1518266580; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=AuvBFgucTbw0tuPo6QSW/jUu42rvomkiTfOZopAkZ/U=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=dvUT0ak3U/S8Os2QVkC8ASBQvWjjhf7Jjbv3+5gsCb5NAG1mUoGgzIopShACYLv3nRWMhr sDZbyRj7ylYcepBcFYqF3LuQcgMxs1Yb3Cbhs8qXQieH1rDyOkt8iCX2oE0BUOglmdE5Jl GiwQuvTio6mtnGddAZQ609VXiq0c1wQ=;
Received: from [192.168.0.3] (cpc121086-nmal24-2-0-cust54.19-2.cable.virginm.net [77.97.145.55]) by statler.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <Wn7o0wBeAbu3@statler.isode.com>; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 12:43:00 +0000
To: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
References: <E16F508E-7C08-4DB2-A570-DDACC162F435@rhul.ac.uk>
Cc: "Paterson, Kenny" <Kenny.Paterson@rhul.ac.uk>, Yehuda Lindell <Yehuda.Lindell@biu.ac.il>, Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org>, Shay Gueron <shay.gueron@gmail.com>
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Message-ID: <5A7EE8E7.5010001@isode.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 12:43:19 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0
In-Reply-To: <E16F508E-7C08-4DB2-A570-DDACC162F435@rhul.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/Bpajotc29vgB8do498FYDywmy5I>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Second RGLC on "AES-GCM-SIV"
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 12:43:03 -0000

Dear CFRG participants,
The Second RGLC has ended and chairs would like to ask editors to post a
new version in response to comments received.

Thank you,
Kenny and Alexey

On 16/01/2018 16:32, Paterson, Kenny wrote:
> Dear CFRG participants,
> 
> This message starts a second 2-week RGLC on "AES-GCM-SIV: Nonce Misuse-Resistant Authenticated Encryption" (draft-irtf-cfrg-gcmsiv-07), that will end on January 30th. See https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-cfrg-gcmsiv for the latest version of the draft.
> 
> We are having a second last call because, although there only were small changes to the draft in going from 06 to 07, we also had the benefit of new security analysis on the draft:
> 
> http://www.cs.ucsb.edu/~tessaro/papers/BHT17.pdf
> 
> We also had some productive discussion on the benefits of using POLYVAL versus GHASH during the previous last call period, with the thread beginning at:
> 
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/current/msg09333.html
> 
> 
> Please send your comments, as well as expression of support to publish as an RFC (or possible reasons for not doing so) in reply to this message or directly to CFRG chairs. Your feedback will help chairs to decide whether the document is ready for review by IRSG and subsequent publication as an RFC.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Alexey and Kenny
>