Re: [Cfrg] Influences [was RE: [TLS] draft-sheffer-tls-bcp: DH recommendations]

David Jacobson <dmjacobson@sbcglobal.net> Wed, 25 September 2013 04:08 UTC

Return-Path: <dmjacobson@sbcglobal.net>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED9F11E81AF for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 21:08:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jQOhFNEA8i3L for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 21:08:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm14-vm5.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm14-vm5.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.63.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66AFE11E80AD for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 21:08:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [216.39.60.165] by nm14.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Sep 2013 04:08:02 -0000
Received: from [67.195.23.148] by tm1.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Sep 2013 04:08:02 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp120.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Sep 2013 04:08:02 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sbcglobal.net; s=s1024; t=1380082082; bh=xjeNHt4FeVvlB4+Q87UeJg49TqjdSEMx/wzzdqaVPak=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-Rocket-Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=s/z0XuMXDooYLI8xo+3fkmDqxrlyuQfAb6lyvKBmXvGLjHMVDE4u8CEJj0/y2pMhIntMb7l5fcpqR5cC5bS7NL4Gx18rFFewoNPcqXYshphYZrTXg+jp51V/Dd3hbv5QNSxpNmq4UZ/0CZte7b2Snc0/58w8gqx+quywwWu/nhE=
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 575711.33606.bm@smtp120.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-YMail-OSG: DZ03dLYVM1lwcHPsYrqJJQXF_Polel7SXTvC2x7C4QcHvXC g1RS0rLGUtAiRMqvJMci8d_q.w9Z5DD61_F8m249mU_OXf1wpK2p1SpdKMoP _utDutnOmiLIcnCRc0k_NG6PBdpZ0jCi1f5BnFkzQFg9KNSRWsbdreiY3ucl rEsfA5OPMUXabnIQX.kWjYmSW8ETm.4OPQxm.MMAR7UR2LxY.3SdSaFUgGd3 3xH0XjJzULw1XbSKUlzXtBafRTPXS9FPEidmuJYRwm.UO03Isiu2QJZC17p6 AgaIGIFgT67h7TH.KPTseBzkFBAeSfg7U1p.oDERPT4Xh0qKsMV0wwOBKSTk Skw1X6CNfhicOyY16AgD0knidY2XUwKvwBcHPaVSw8lS6VnU9BEP6uC9kHcb 9KNAV8DdJmVynq7Fn.I1_aKPxk9cI4A0xUUUP6nmkdLEMP8wNj.d1rS8fXEs SmBDpEkMgZVj6k6OfSekNBHYbJVKvpgPzunlrLTqiW6644xL26GA_wnTaWCe A19nt_mcUKFks9gc5j4rBFkyWD7U0elxZ2nNUFiArY3kGEq1_o7bpxlP4yGx pBK6bPa7ahA4PTDrz4i0E
X-Yahoo-SMTP: nOrmCa6swBAE50FabWnlVFUpgFVJ9Gbi__8U5mpvhtQq7tTV1g--
X-Rocket-Received: from [192.168.1.64] (dmjacobson@99.120.98.171 with ) by smtp120.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Sep 2013 04:08:02 +0000 UTC
Message-ID: <524261A1.4000905@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 21:08:01 -0700
From: David Jacobson <dmjacobson@sbcglobal.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dan Brown <dbrown@certicom.com>
References: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C7355676085@uxcn10-6.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> <810C31990B57ED40B2062BA10D43FBF5BDA0EE@XMB116CNC.rim.net>
In-Reply-To: <810C31990B57ED40B2062BA10D43FBF5BDA0EE@XMB116CNC.rim.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "'cfrg@irtf.org'" <cfrg@irtf.org>, "'pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz'" <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Influences [was RE: [TLS] draft-sheffer-tls-bcp: DH recommendations]
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 04:08:23 -0000

On 9/24/13 10:11 AM, Dan Brown wrote:
> On one hand, P256 etc depend on SHA1; ...
How does P256 depend on SHA1?

    --David Jacobson