Re: [CFRG] Combinitorics probabilities
Robert Moskowitz <rgm-sec@htt-consult.com> Mon, 08 August 2022 21:36 UTC
Return-Path: <rgm-sec@htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 450E3C15A72D for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 14:36:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iJ1JDGpsa1dD for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 14:36:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [23.123.122.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB8BDC15A724 for <cfrg@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 14:36:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D4162762; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 17:36:08 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at htt-consult.com
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id zwJzghiUwQPl; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 17:36:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.160.11] (unknown [192.168.160.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB5D562434; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 17:35:59 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <9d0d9b76-9176-f71f-f45a-046dd74df339@htt-consult.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2022 17:36:31 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0
Content-Language: en-US
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm-sec@htt-consult.com>
To: Dan Brown <danibrown@blackberry.com>, "cfrg@ietf.org" <cfrg@ietf.org>
References: <44268f7f-168e-fe67-af53-e6b26be2ef9c@htt-consult.com> <9d5b685c84294f45b1712e49683593fc@blackberry.com> <cf1d6448-cedb-fed4-ca8c-f5c071f82c84@htt-consult.com>
In-Reply-To: <cf1d6448-cedb-fed4-ca8c-f5c071f82c84@htt-consult.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/D0h-UI6tX22KKDGCfE0khxgE8xQ>
Subject: Re: [CFRG] Combinitorics probabilities
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2022 21:36:49 -0000
On 8/8/22 17:16, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > On 8/8/22 17:07, Dan Brown wrote: >> I think you want: >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_distribution#Tail_bounds > > Pretty heavy lifting and it does not read like my problem. Then I > read the intro: > > The binomial distribution is frequently used to model the number of > successes in a sample of size n drawn with replacement from a > population of size N. If the sampling is carried out without > replacement, the draws are not independent and so the resulting > distribution is a hypergeometric distribution, not a binomial one. > However, for N much larger than n, the binomial distribution remains a > good approximation, and is widely used. > > > I believe this is "without replacement" and N is close to n. > > e.g.: 5 messages are sent. You want to receive at least 3 of them; > any 3 and more is ok. The probablity of receiving any one message is > p... > > So off to look at hypergeometric distribution? No not hypergeometric. Back to binomial. Fun! This is stuff I learned back around '69 or '70! Where are those brain cells hiding? I had enough stat then that I could have degreed in it, but I did not consider it fun... Maybe I burned those cells after getting my comp sci degree? :) > > >> Best regards, >> Dan >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: CFRG <cfrg-bounces@irtf.org> On Behalf Of Robert Moskowitz >>> Sent: Monday, August 8, 2022 4:59 PM >>> To: cfrg@ietf.org >>> Subject: [CFRG] Combinitorics probabilities >>> >>> CAUTION - This email is from an external source. Please be >>> cautious with >>> links >>> and attachments. (go/taginfo) >>> >>> Well I spent the afternoon googling, but my search foo is weak. >>> >>> I want the formula for the probablity of receiving at least m out of n >>> messages >>> given the probablity of receiving any message is p. >>> >>> I did find: >>> >>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.statology.org/probability-of-at- >>> >>> least- >>> two/*:*:text=P(X**B2)*20*3D,(X**B2)*20*3D*200.3673__;I37iiaUlJeKJpSUlJQ >>> !!JoeW-IhCUkS0Jg!cUlR8MdsZ0VvH1GymBznGvOigS- >>> vQjTeU2LxJmllO1oVh8_GNKrvuam52NbSOIT2KzNggbgkbpzkfqyWTupj$ >>> >>> But this is a series to find the final answer, not the 'final' formula. >>> >>> So for example to receive at least 2 out of 3 messages where the >>> probablity >>> of >>> any message at 95% comes out to 97.2% >>> >>> But what about 3 out of 5? etc. >>> >>> Pointer is greatly appreciated. >>> >>> I took stat just too many decades ago, and I have not kept that >>> knife sharp. >>> >>> thanks >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CFRG mailing list >>> CFRG@irtf.org >>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg__;!!Jo >>> >>> eW-IhCUkS0Jg!cUlR8MdsZ0VvH1GymBznGvOigS- >>> vQjTeU2LxJmllO1oVh8_GNKrvuam52NbSOIT2KzNggbgkbpzkfuM8oXQq$ >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain >> confidential information, privileged material (including material >> protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or >> constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by >> anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have >> received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the >> sender and delete this information from your system. Use, >> dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by >> unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CFRG mailing list >> CFRG@irtf.org >> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg > > _______________________________________________ > CFRG mailing list > CFRG@irtf.org > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
- [CFRG] Combinitorics probabilities Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [CFRG] Combinitorics probabilities Taylor R Campbell
- Re: [CFRG] Combinitorics probabilities Dan Brown
- Re: [CFRG] Combinitorics probabilities Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [CFRG] Combinitorics probabilities Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [CFRG] Combinitorics probabilities Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [CFRG] Combinitorics probabilities David Jacobson
- Re: [CFRG] Combinitorics probabilities Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [CFRG] Combinitorics probabilities Dan Collins
- Re: [CFRG] Combinitorics probabilities David Jacobson
- Re: [CFRG] Combinitorics probabilities Robert Moskowitz