Re: [Cfrg] Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred curves around 256bit work factor (ends on March 3rd)

[_MiW <[e-mail]>]

1) acceptable
2) acceptable
3) /E-521/ preferred
4) /numsp512t1 acceptable, M-511 acceptable/

On 26/02/2015 12:57 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> CFRG chairs are starting another poll:
>
> Q3: This is a Quaker poll (please answer one of "preferred", 
> "acceptable" or "no") for each curve specified below:
>
> 1) 448 (Goldilocks)
> 2) 480
> 3) 521
> 4) other curve (please name another curve that you "prefer" or "accept", 
> or state "no")
>
> If you stated your curve preferences in the poll that ended on February 
> 23rd (see the attachment), you don't need to reply to this poll, your 
> opinion is already recorded. But please double check what chairs 
> recorded (see the attachment).
>
> If you changed your mind or only answered the question about performance 
> versa memory usage for curves 512 and 521, feel free to reply.
>
> Once this issues is settled, we will be discussing (in no particular 
> order. Chairs reserve the right to add additional questions) 
> implementation specifics and coordinate systems for Diffie-Hellman. We 
> will then make decisions on signature schemes. Please don't discuss any 
> of these future topics at this time.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cfrg mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg