Re: [Cfrg] Adoption call for draft-hoffman-c2pq-02

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

On 10/02/18 16:43, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> On 10/02/2018 15:46, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>
>> On 10/02/18 14:30, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>>> Dear CFRG participants,
>>> Based on interest in this topic/document during IETF 100 in Singapore
>>> (and based on earlier discussions), CFRG Chairs are asking for any
>>> objections to adopting "The Transition from Classical to Post-Quantum
>>> Cryptography" (draft-hoffman-c2pq-02) as a CFRG document.
>>>
>>> Please send your comments by February 24th.
>>
>> I'm not sure if this is worthwhile, but it might be. The
>> probability that it ends up with something that's not
>> worth publishing as an RFC seems fairly high to me.
>>
>> So long as adoption doesn't mean a commitment to eventual
>> publication of an RFC on this topic, then I don't object.
>> If the chairs consider adoption is such a commitment then
>> I would be against that.
> 
> Adoption doesn't mean commitment to publish. If after doing the work
> there is no consensus that the document needs publishing, it will not be
> published.

Thanks. With that clarification, I've no problem this
being discussed/worked-on.

S.


> 
> Best Regards,
> Alexey
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
PGP key change time for me.
New-ID 7B172BEA; old-ID 805F8DA2 expires Jan 24 2018.
NewWithOld sigs in keyservers.
Sorry if that mucks something up;-)