Re: [CFRG] [Cfrg] Call for adoption: Threshold Signatures

isis agora lovecruft <> Mon, 02 November 2020 22:18 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D0C83A13AC for <>; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 14:18:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.b=UjJgOsMn; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.b=EuJTgpFh
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WBUzSbp-DUfS for <>; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 14:18:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03E1E3A134C for <>; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 14:18:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D2DD374142; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 22:18:34 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;; s=mail; t=1604355514; bh=C2MPMfOaUWRkGIs4rbZDPFTQwtli5r7u/HcF1sfs5yc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=UjJgOsMnmdGXQKJkvf8R2vn7L45+dCJBl+VBMOXqvkB9tbdXM2l2aRqhpBj9ZRquH Bx9OdAglmewkVYA1LsUuoUPGA3X0TxbqZjb2zZZ14xJtELg5WC6x5WY/y9Axs+elZ1 XsqNg84YLFU27tVTLVFn/cShPg5cYuZwbgfZk1lU=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EwGbEFAkZhgQ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 22:18:32 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 22:17:57 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;; s=mail; t=1604355512; bh=C2MPMfOaUWRkGIs4rbZDPFTQwtli5r7u/HcF1sfs5yc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=EuJTgpFh4CfrIbtAM0fkd2HZ5EZbMPLiR7yzg/LhUtdTmu+NNFigvzrdj5sw3ngug /UE+T+IJ/tmrS9ic2ctX+t/e9m+QAp67lLsJbhgikeBz6mOUbXIvJcttP0GTo5DAXm Awuax531a9IijcuViUkQvzySQ9seu26A2iyL9B34=
From: isis agora lovecruft <>
To: Christopher Wood <>
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <>
X-Louis-Lingg: In this hope do I say to you I despise you. I despise your order, your laws, your force-propped authority. Hang me for it!
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [CFRG] [Cfrg] Call for adoption: Threshold Signatures
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 22:19:01 -0000

Christopher Wood transcribed 1.1K bytes:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2020, at 9:33 AM, Nick Sullivan wrote:

> Probably only one. The structure of draft-hallambaker-threshold-sigs as an
> extension to RFC8032 is attractive, though I think draft-komlo-frost (and
> the related paper) is generally a better starting point, especially given
> its assessment of attacks on related schemes such as 2020/945. It also
> seems to have plenty of backing implementations and reviews. If we can
> specialize it to RFC8032, perhaps with Richard's work as the basis for
> that change, then I prefer FROST.

Hi Chris,

What do you mean by specialising it to RHC8032?  Do you mean literally
producing RFC8032 backwards compatible EdDSA signatures using the ed25519
and ed448 groups?

Best regards,
 ♥Ⓐ isis agora lovecruft
OpenPGP: 4096R/0A6A58A14B5946ABDE18E207A3ADB67A2CDB8B35
Current Keys: