Re: [Cfrg] No CFRG meeting in Honolulu

Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Mon, 13 October 2014 17:02 UTC

Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19D8B1A1ACF for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:02:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fuy6U6MijKqY for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:02:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yh0-x234.google.com (mail-yh0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7567C1A1AE1 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:02:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yh0-f52.google.com with SMTP id f10so3819457yha.11 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:02:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=eEfTELD5J/gjDAapTlTOMsCR0PR2KDVjCWvRXB/x5X0=; b=gB1wR6A60B9My+o3POGRhwu2LikkMcLl+WdcqNUHbDsu0xNT8Tlx8Yqfpvt/f0EaVg oq5FlZ2JocR4nIMw42VlzQ+A/eQeVmWiHSbG0VS6vYbI6FJoahhjztEwFv/dQeXm53Dy RoKmxLePOqw0oY0rohdGOg7cghnro5C5t4DsAfgvusDyHx2ka/ltO9+v31xL9rl2J4Fh 28m+hXndly8AHiYC54/ckqe66FIToon5ZmEwhaG9jgDpokqnQGe8LxZBYptYj9zm/qCX J6eGYME/9fFLxYTEmQ7Om4UBWeOf8dPror7iE/LlJDPFwWTnWevvb6xMsDXBy740hzJk B/Cg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.236.150.138 with SMTP id z10mr5673415yhj.138.1413219741703; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:02:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.170.195.149 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:02:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.170.195.149 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:02:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <F9A313E5-BDA4-4DBC-914A-E8AEF8ACE09C@tzi.org>
References: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739439BB0974B@TK5EX14MBXC286.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <543BFCA9.6070509@isode.com> <CAMm+Lwg8MKbKNufUU+n+Uq941DRy-Q31om9w=AuvE-NhRj8OMg@mail.gmail.com> <CACsn0c=P7r4y6KswCoDKCJWqmycv_FHz7g-imesw8iMfF+tiWA@mail.gmail.com> <F9A313E5-BDA4-4DBC-914A-E8AEF8ACE09C@tzi.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:02:21 -0700
Message-ID: <CACsn0c=okpUcK68w5PpVkBAD=P9d+obAbc=cqHKJRHoWyfr4yw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf302efb32b1a40b050550dc3c
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/EPSr7MXtmeUvuLFQCa6qC4omkk4
Cc: cfrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] No CFRG meeting in Honolulu
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 17:02:36 -0000

On Oct 13, 2014 9:41 AM, "Carsten Bormann" <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
>
> > What more needs to be said? The costs and benefits of the various
options have been outlined at length. As far as I can tell, we're waiting
on a decision.
>
> That now is the strongest possible reason to have a face-to-face meeting.

Why can't you send an email saying what you want to say? If the
conversation can't happen over email, why would it work face to face?

I don't have thousands of dollars to go to Hawaii for the week.
Furthermore,  while the formula and field choices are almost irrelevant,
the point format and coordinate choice have security implications. I'd like
to see a clear record of how these decisions were made, which f2f does not
lend itself to.

Sincerely,
Watson Ladd

>
> Grüße, Carsten