[Cfrg] ISE needs reviews/reviewers for draft-hao-jpake-04 and draft-hao-schnorr-04

Nevil Brownlee <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 06 September 2016 23:13 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD2212B3BE for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 16:13:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.621
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.621 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TW1XAULKylvq for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 16:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED22E12B29B for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 16:12:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93021E5D60; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 16:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kzW5Tc3_lWWW; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 16:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:df0::2006:31b2:7a8f:e0e5:1b55] (unknown [IPv6:2001:df0:0:2006:31b2:7a8f:e0e5:1b55]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2AE0B1E5D5D; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 16:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: Nevil Brownlee <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
To: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Message-ID: <62ad0809-3d41-bc0c-43cc-2fb5adb82973@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 11:12:56 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/FYvOSqZYPbDLHR9thURO1on0axg>
Cc: ISE <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: [Cfrg] ISE needs reviews/reviewers for draft-hao-jpake-04 and draft-hao-schnorr-04
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2016 23:13:00 -0000

Hi CFRG folk:

Feng Hao has submitted this draft to me as an Independent
Submission, now I'm looking for a few brief reviews.

Could you have a look at it, and tell me - briefly -
what you think of it, please?

Better, I need to find a few actual reviewers.  The request I
usually send to potential reviewers is appended below; if you'd
be willing to review either or both of these drafts for me,
please let me know at ISE <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>

Thanks, Nevil (Independent Submissions Editor)

 > Also, would you be prepared to do a more detailed review, with two
 > parts:
 >      a) Comments for the Authors
 >         Reasons for rejection or suggestions for improvements.
 >         These will be returned to authors (or you may wish to have
 >         email discussions directly with authors).  These may be
 > 	  be published in a 'Shepherd write-up' if this draft
 > 	  is sent to the IESG for a Conflict Review (RFC 5741).
 >      b) Comments for the Independent Submissions Editor
 >         These are advice to the ISE, and will not be published.
 > If you can do the review, two to three weeks would be a good time
 > frame.
 > If not, could you suggest other possible reviewers, please?

Nevil Brownlee (ISE), rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org