[CFRG] Re: Adoption Call: Partially Blind RSA Signatures

Chris Barber <cbarbernash@gmail.com> Wed, 21 August 2024 17:02 UTC

Return-Path: <cbarbernash@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A48C14F74A for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 10:02:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ausIQ8cwC4Rs for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 10:02:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb44.google.com (mail-yb1-xb44.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b44]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95F91C15108D for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 10:02:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb44.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e116b591e15so7159466276.3 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 10:02:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1724259749; x=1724864549; darn=irtf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=sOOdWH6jGErj+RXd9PDjEO+z5pmqMKny8fkPvW9Q/Nc=; b=DxoXz2pXe5XfYLngeIb41dUtt70CB6S6KBT0Bv0LEVQ/LIew004pI1ftLf5F2F8ws5 QY6iB3aSni+DTAh1YIS4swffBefxfiK+UNA0kwE93a0AKH5upqDhyUS+ekyikiso8nQ1 I1FZdIGyyMI5sDYrXvs3H0ZtTeXzv6L+33wju+QD9s/b2+6pOyugMYKrcYB7YtUnHk17 4riZpfzoeatRxpvjMlAKEaqW+vSAefaoy/A2nhi7l0pfjv+Xjss0UXaJug9CW76zufwv ni0cOglvpdZiAdNIZv/Xca7glCAcEc8y4lxvcb+gKVlAlbI+QMcj3mRyTqtPb72FcJ0M 3Uhw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1724259749; x=1724864549; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=sOOdWH6jGErj+RXd9PDjEO+z5pmqMKny8fkPvW9Q/Nc=; b=N5PXaWNfNz1fwpE7yFeiErLASfvQVfCeimuteGICUw4C9+RyeCBn8olbh4Mi0MHDxa D/2V9penbZecnmikErsFr5Y84mNos0Fovt1y7wvsv5L7rquuhihG2i0XU/agfSyMQxWg npVMoL+1H4OiGo6AZfkcDiCWtHA6V76lJIL7CX4Ov5dTfd3VqKy8toBOJYK0pzz/ndh3 4VidZ1TUPqxa3TGv8beMRIGdkC9nOYKGFWR9xlBtbQmC4OqjNSqovgQt6Xh8YOcPepgY dQoz7CuKfKPVRGdN8dI7+28nEaAc6/s51+vCals9S/fGU6vCpK0KgtrvwxVlYDeXs16b Gjuw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyfLW6PLWegfNAnZ5UZxl32EZA7VM4VHGZZd8u4RUc0FCWqVOFy D48yRtIYIAmSQqFifRleK8m0fvOy3EKSLCthpsP/Pc6LBKuGEKyXzw1iPX2csZdTGPGT2O/aJMl YkLl7hJkVu6L0y3N/sFXgpK13EqU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGZVHZeRoef1XEwcspuwZuJ0E9BoVjDo8vX+SAb7+NKMmxUELCgdHye5GU0nuWYIJoQUQFipRxsFMyfd2Xne94=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:841:b0:e11:819d:638d with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e1665414394mr4105895276.9.1724259748792; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 10:02:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMr0u6=Q2FGZeoZKMpNiBV+osFkvEWLDRQDsp5xCOdmXTULb+w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMr0u6=Q2FGZeoZKMpNiBV+osFkvEWLDRQDsp5xCOdmXTULb+w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Chris Barber <cbarbernash@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 19:02:18 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFzKZmz134cTEEv2huCp66rECMVMGSRKFauFhj+Ze_zbf-cZbA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d3cfb806203481c2"
Message-ID-Hash: WEMMBJVYZZW7ZT6WFHCAC5BJSMSGLSHA
X-Message-ID-Hash: WEMMBJVYZZW7ZT6WFHCAC5BJSMSGLSHA
X-MailFrom: cbarbernash@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-cfrg.irtf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: CFRG <cfrg@irtf.org>, cfrg-chairs@ietf.org, draft-amjad-cfrg-partially-blind-rsa@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [CFRG] Re: Adoption Call: Partially Blind RSA Signatures
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/Fqs2FM9uIHXzhzKhsK9xNCC2O6g>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:cfrg-owner@irtf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cfrg-join@irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cfrg-leave@irtf.org>

Hi everyone,

I’m curious why we should adopt this particular protocol, and whether
moving away from RSA might be a better path forward for new protocols.

The Tessaro-Zhu [1] and Kaster-Loss-Rosenberg-Xu [2] protocols are more
efficient, and the concurrency concerns in the Abe–Okamoto protocol could
likely be addressed.

[1] https://eprint.iacr.org/2022/047
[2] https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/1071

On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 11:24 AM Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <smyshsv@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear CFRG participants,
>
> This message is starting 3 weeks adoption call on "Partially Blind RSA
> Signatures" draft, draft-amjad-cfrg-partially-blind-rsa (
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-amjad-cfrg-partially-blind-rsa/)
> that will end on September 6th 2024.
>
> Please send your feedback in reply to this email or directly to CFRG
> chairs <cfrg-chairs@ietf.org> <cfrg-chairs@ietf.org>.
>
> Best regards,
> Stanislav (for CFRG chairs)
> _______________________________________________
> CFRG mailing list -- cfrg@irtf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to cfrg-leave@irtf.org
>