IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cfrg] Summary

Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> Thu, 01 January 2015 19:03 UTC

Return-Path: <kurt@roeckx.be>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C43A1A039C for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Jan 2015 11:03:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DFw-B3W9Fsw5 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Jan 2015 11:03:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from defiant.e-webshops.eu (defiant.e-webshops.eu [82.146.122.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D94DA1A0395 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 1 Jan 2015 11:03:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from intrepid.roeckx.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by defiant.e-webshops.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D591C2017; Thu, 1 Jan 2015 20:03:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: by intrepid.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D70231FE01E6; Thu, 1 Jan 2015 20:03:32 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 20:03:32 +0100
From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
To: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20150101190332.GA18703@roeckx.be>
References: <20150101144926.GA4784@roeckx.be> <CACsn0ckip8ZK=wYEAPJGAxwxBEBkXkSJQi9uPZQ7dmXPo77bGQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACsn0ckip8ZK=wYEAPJGAxwxBEBkXkSJQi9uPZQ7dmXPo77bGQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/G0tBooqBH49vnV_fXxs_yZqtwMY
Cc: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Summary
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 19:03:37 -0000

On Thu, Jan 01, 2015 at 10:50:49AM -0500, Watson Ladd wrote:
> > - Is there some document with requirements, and maybe a comparison
> >   of how the proposals meet the requirements?
> 
> No. The chairs suggested making one, but then didn't. Part of the
> problem is everyone was gaming the requirements to make their own
> proposals look better.

I think it could be useful to have such a list.  Please note that
not all the requirements are of equal importance, some might be a
MUST and others might be nice to have.  The importance might also
change depending on the use, like TLS, SSH, PGP or X509.  Maybe
we can't agree on those levels, but I think a list a list could
be useful.


Kurt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email