IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Tue, 27 January 2015 15:59 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F22A1A1B35 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 07:59:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lolcRuNHO-D0 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 07:59:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09D221A8873 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 07:57:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D66BE83; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:57:38 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HHoyeT_Rd3zL; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:57:38 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [134.226.36.180] (stephen-think.dsg.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.36.180]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 41C01BE80; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:57:38 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <54C7B572.2020109@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:57:38 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
References: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73AAF68325@uxcn10-tdc05.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> <54C76EED.6090205@cs.tcd.ie> <sjm386wjko8.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <b2b8d964885246748ebde894064b6a3c@ustx2ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <b2b8d964885246748ebde894064b6a3c@ustx2ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/GicgpBe4XkmuN_uXo5OCURwzWPk>
Cc: "'cfrg@irtf.org'" <cfrg@irtf.org>, Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Point format endian
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:59:55 -0000

On 27/01/15 15:46, Salz, Rich wrote:
> Don't they have a different code path for the math implementation?

Right. So it makes very little to no difference really I'd guess.

Or if someone has code where it would then sending a pointer to
that would help me at least. Anytime I've done that kind of code
it'd have been no problem at all to deal with this issue.

S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email