Re: [Cfrg] Requesting removal of CFRG co-chair

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Sun, 22 December 2013 09:15 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E5F41AE0D5 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 01:15:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.44
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.44 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VCebSmojDI1F for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 01:14:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx11.netapp.com (mx11.netapp.com [216.240.18.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 424C71AE1D2 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 01:14:56 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.95,530,1384329600"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="90904829"
Received: from vmwexceht02-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.240]) by mx11-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 22 Dec 2013 01:14:53 -0800
Received: from SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.2.244]) by vmwexceht02-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.240]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 01:14:52 -0800
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: Trevor Perrin <trevp@trevp.net>
Thread-Topic: [Cfrg] Requesting removal of CFRG co-chair
Thread-Index: AQHO/ZzRgHcNIJXbA0aZGyA6Cmm6Vppe/aUAgABwo4CAAQkagA==
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 09:14:52 +0000
Message-ID: <9C510AB3-B16B-4328-9998-BCF11B6D9375@netapp.com>
References: <CAGZ8ZG2f9QHX40RcB8aajWvEfG0Gh_uewu2Rq7bQGHYNx6cOmw@mail.gmail.com> <45FC33A8-1944-4DCD-B88E-2A6B6CC4A39B@netapp.com> <CAGZ8ZG3077tdr03nTD5E3DMVXeKVC6-sgs7oWVHPaPHe_mQ8KA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGZ8ZG3077tdr03nTD5E3DMVXeKVC6-sgs7oWVHPaPHe_mQ8KA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.104.60.118]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F46E780A-B435-49D6-BF5E-25CF28CED434"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Requesting removal of CFRG co-chair
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 09:15:02 -0000

Hi,

On 2013-12-21, at 18:25, Trevor Perrin <trevp@trevp.net>; wrote:
> I think the issues here are also relevant to the IETF WGs which rely on CFRG.
> 
> I hope there's some way to engage this broader set of stakeholders in
> the discussion.  I admit I'm not sure the best way to do that.

the best way is on this list. You're email was about concerns with a chair of the CFRG, and the CFRG list is hence the best place for the discussion.

Your initial email was CC'ed more widely, as was my replay directing people to discuss on cfrg@irtf.org, so everyone interested should be aware of where to send email.

Lars