Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00
"Blumenthal, Uri - 0558 - MITLL" <uri@ll.mit.edu> Tue, 05 February 2013 20:31 UTC
Return-Path: <prvs=5748726cfc=uri@ll.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3442B21F8467 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 12:31:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.402
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.402 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5T8wvbWu-1pO for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 12:31:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.ll.mit.edu (MX2.LL.MIT.EDU [129.55.12.46]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D44421F8460 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 12:31:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from LLE2K7-HUB01.mitll.ad.local (LLE2K7-HUB01.mitll.ad.local) by mx2.ll.mit.edu (unknown) with ESMTP id r15KVQUT006499; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 15:31:26 -0500
From: "Blumenthal, Uri - 0558 - MITLL" <uri@ll.mit.edu>
To: "Igoe, Kevin M." <kmigoe@nsa.gov>, "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:31:23 -0500
Thread-Topic: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00
Thread-Index: Ac4D38VB2J6B5HRLRuSMK1YVli3oIA==
Message-ID: <CD36D4B4.E927%uri@ll.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <3C4AAD4B5304AB44A6BA85173B4675CA662973B8@MSMR-GH1-UEA03.corp.nsa.gov>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.5.121010
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="B_3442923083_25828595"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8327, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-02-05_05:2013-02-04, 2013-02-05, 1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=9 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1211240000 definitions=main-1302050157
Cc: 'Phillip Rogaway' <rogaway@cs.ucdavis.edu>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 20:31:32 -0000
Perhaps I wasn't attentive enough but I saw no reference to Intellectual Property (IP) restrictions. OCB mode used to be patented and not free. Then I've heard that the restrictions were relaxed so that a person could use it free of charge unless the intended (?) purpose was military-related which would exclude Government employees and Government contractors.So regardless of what the current restrictions are, IMHO they have to be spelled out clearly, or at worst referred to in the References section (and it better be "one hop"!). Tnx! P.S. My sotto voce I'd love to see how OCB compares to GCM on the current Intel chips that have GF and AES hardware speedups. -- Regards, Uri Blumenthal <Disclaimer> From: <Igoe>, "Kevin M." <kmigoe@nsa.gov> Date: Tuesday, February 5, 2013 10:08 To: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org> Cc: 'Phillip Rogaway' <rogaway@cs.ucdavis.edu> Subject: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 > We are issuing a RG Last Call on draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00. This has been well > evaluated > on the outside & no objections have been raised on the mailing list. Please > look > it over, paying particular attention to the IETF related usual issues such as > intellectual > property rights. It would be nice to have this finished before Orlando! > > > ----------------+-------------------------------------------------- > Kevin M. Igoe | "We can't solve problems by using the same kind > kmigoe@nsa.gov | of thinking we used when we created them." > | - Albert Einstein - > ----------------+-------------------------------------------------- > > >
- [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 Igoe, Kevin M.
- Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 Blumenthal, Uri - 0558 - MITLL
- Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 Ted Krovetz
- Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 Blumenthal, Uri - 0558 - MITLL
- Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 Ted Krovetz
- Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 Yoav Nir
- Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 Igoe, Kevin M.
- Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 Greg Rose
- Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 Ted Krovetz
- Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 Blumenthal, Uri - 0558 - MITLL
- Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 Ted Krovetz
- Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 Blumenthal, Uri - 0558 - MITLL
- Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 Joachim Strömbergson
- Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 Simon Josefsson
- Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 Ted Krovetz
- Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 Blumenthal, Uri - 0558 - MITLL
- Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 Jon Callas
- Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 Blumenthal, Uri - 0558 - MITLL
- Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 Ted Krovetz
- Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 Simon Josefsson
- Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 Simon Josefsson
- Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 Igoe, Kevin M.
- Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 Jon Callas
- Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 David McGrew (mcgrew)
- Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 David McGrew (mcgrew)
- Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 Phillip Rogaway
- [Cfrg] intel license (was: Re: RG Last Call - dra… David McGrew (mcgrew)
- Re: [Cfrg] intel license (was: Re: RG Last Call -… Ted Krovetz
- Re: [Cfrg] intel license (was: Re: RG Last Call -… Blumenthal, Uri - 0558 - MITLL
- Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 Joachim Strömbergson
- Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 David McGrew (mcgrew)
- Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 Ted Krovetz
- Re: [Cfrg] RG Last Call - draft-irtf-cfrg-ocb-00 Joachim Strömbergson