Re: [Cfrg] Dual_EC_DRBG ... [was RE: Requesting removal of CFRG co-chair]

David McGrew <mcgrew@cisco.com> Fri, 27 December 2013 21:42 UTC

Return-Path: <mcgrew@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB921AE652 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 13:42:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.039
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.039 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jk6w7fwd4lKo for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 13:42:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mtv-iport-1.cisco.com (mtv-iport-1.cisco.com [173.36.130.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584061AE245 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 13:42:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=222; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1388180550; x=1389390150; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nI65O4YqBlk1Sqf6Qwoc5vYid2fwBUlHkhuUeaLee4E=; b=JOcFwLTPGtcOJG7Aq9vG2FyYrAmHHTasmEXP3P8UY4TbBxYQyKPmpcyc 7O3CRQ2wNATlZWc3el0+QEk2xYQUMgY/bXPxTxeT2YCkRQxmBhOwxjVbI +acIC7TdiMc1WxBVpJOgy6o9LNSSvgAz7CaHau48B2RUGKfAlvTBvfSs9 s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgYFAN7zvVKrRDoJ/2dsb2JhbABYgwuNSq0dgRsWdIImAQEEOEARCyEWDwkDAgECAUUGDQgCh3/JFBePJIQ2AQOJQ45UhkWEBodJg0se
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,562,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="98337575"
Received: from mtv-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.58.9]) by mtv-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Dec 2013 21:42:28 +0000
Received: from [10.0.2.15] (sjc-vpn5-916.cisco.com [10.21.91.148]) by mtv-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rBRLgS5c002004 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 21:42:28 GMT
Message-ID: <52BDF443.6080304@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 16:42:27 -0500
From: David McGrew <mcgrew@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130922 Icedove/17.0.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
References: <810C31990B57ED40B2062BA10D43FBF5C18718@XMB116CNC.rim.net>
In-Reply-To: <810C31990B57ED40B2062BA10D43FBF5C18718@XMB116CNC.rim.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Dual_EC_DRBG ... [was RE: Requesting removal of CFRG co-chair]
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 21:42:36 -0000

I understand that these topics deserve discussion, but in the long term 
it might be more fruitful to consider what recommendations should be 
given to implementers and standards group on the subject of PRNGs.

David