Re: [Cfrg] Dual_EC_DRBG ... [was RE: Requesting removal of CFRG co-chair]

"Dan Harkins" <dharkins@lounge.org> Fri, 27 December 2013 21:45 UTC

Return-Path: <dharkins@lounge.org>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 914721AE675 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 13:45:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.867
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.867 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VH3hVuvw_RZ8 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 13:45:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from colo.trepanning.net (colo.trepanning.net [69.55.226.174]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17431AE673 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 13:45:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from www.trepanning.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colo.trepanning.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2245A10224008; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 13:45:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 69.12.173.8 (SquirrelMail authenticated user dharkins@lounge.org) by www.trepanning.net with HTTP; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 13:45:39 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <3c96bfce5622182ffcad22267d37aaa4.squirrel@www.trepanning.net>
In-Reply-To: <52BDF443.6080304@cisco.com>
References: <810C31990B57ED40B2062BA10D43FBF5C18718@XMB116CNC.rim.net> <52BDF443.6080304@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 13:45:39 -0800 (PST)
From: "Dan Harkins" <dharkins@lounge.org>
To: "David McGrew" <mcgrew@cisco.com>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.14 [SVN]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Cc: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Dual_EC_DRBG ... [was RE: Requesting removal of CFRG co-chair]
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 21:45:47 -0000

On Fri, December 27, 2013 1:42 pm, David McGrew wrote:
> I understand that these topics deserve discussion, but in the long term
> it might be more fruitful to consider what recommendations should be
> given to implementers and standards group on the subject of PRNGs.

  Indeed! And might this discussion move to dsfjdssdfsd@ietf.org, the
mailing list formed to discuss just this very subject?

  Dan.