Re: [Cfrg] Closing out tls1.3 "Limits on key usage" PRs (#765/#769)

Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com> Mon, 13 February 2017 23:25 UTC

Return-Path: <bascule@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B20129430 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:25:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9oHUHFwox1ur for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:25:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk0-x232.google.com (mail-vk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F86112946E for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:25:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk0-x232.google.com with SMTP id r136so70789855vke.1 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:25:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fJNE7OtKbDiV901D5n5md9yUJun4f+A02r7fHPg+AZE=; b=XV05Uzi9xuAsHj/GlD5UlaDKy0a4Kayg3DX56bClNb7lDA1x71Paa3RLSfvft2DxWT OUq/vJbbdYZ68NsDjqAis0RpPsQrZZ7+tyVkFXh6PVgUS+3FiCpMtYg8t57JVfjFtJ5T /M401TcGZfCNcqk8bfhbOh2Ofxx9lqTVrCTodubm2Kfs6BiCXrm9Jc6Fq+LNSGYX7gcu gKvG/CL4Djkw4hSsuBXzdlfI2ZMaIBqvnNO6Hsz0yNXWaxfvWE2C09RocRJOIehuYMIc p9nyk2XKfNDVIxHAXhQFrb/7xeeubnNt18FjAtDYyaiXkWiCKu/ZXcpYKpFSPk/vrBWP g5uQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fJNE7OtKbDiV901D5n5md9yUJun4f+A02r7fHPg+AZE=; b=oFCNaWxVpF85Nz/R1M3rtZqJEXZAZD3c9X+IjkRmjJkE+XDNvR2UQ8iloOxGCQkpq5 yIxPr+CycXc+xHi7VP7U99a9D06P4I3d6Vq2yk4/K3oxqhkQhEiOrNwPQxReQ9Y3W4Rj pthg5+MVn9ebHeyoNY9EbRtv3bnhjpCN8iQbQ2+xDP0s2BXfDWlCybKIqjTaW1D+/8by EmtlB5bQopUFjOKto20+x0JQ3PgkMqx+M0vQBftS8NbZ3VtwNwWihebIIQFOtKQiX800 4aJpEq9Z1GFASMx69RV5AsOXTJNXZf4UBN3hsu38rKBZOXfez1VyfI/DC+M0aTkoYcGL 0QBw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39m+v39zsaUhOqA8WVJNlYYmqGu5qeiGPYir9JrEP/vQbFm0ICipp+uF2I5sf7QCrJ9BwEmA3ccnAjgnnw==
X-Received: by 10.31.213.7 with SMTP id m7mr11134474vkg.48.1487028326752; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:25:26 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.70.130 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:25:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <95D221C7-40A6-4BDD-B8CD-5C4F9C405D3F@azet.org>
References: <352D31A3-5A8B-4790-9473-195C256DEEC8@sn3rd.com> <95D221C7-40A6-4BDD-B8CD-5C4F9C405D3F@azet.org>
From: Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:25:06 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHOTMVJzogVu6K0MDNBux2STtbzkGT0yAopGOaEJXEzhOwSL6w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Aaron Zauner <azet@azet.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c07aadc2ff35b054871c36b
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/J8kWuf6F9nnsx-87Hh_xVEr0zbs>
Cc: IRTF CFRG <cfrg@irtf.org>, "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Closing out tls1.3 "Limits on key usage" PRs (#765/#769)
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 23:25:30 -0000

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Aaron Zauner <azet@azet.org> wrote:

> I thought the cited paper sorted this out like a year ago.
>
> In favor of option a


I am also in favor of option A.

The wording in option B is simultaneously much more unclear and much more
verbose. I consider it a regression.

Option C is more similar to option A, but not an improvement, IMO.

-- 
Tony Arcieri