IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Consensus and a way forward]

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Mon, 15 December 2014 17:33 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D3DE1A86FC for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:33:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RLw7NGUv_rub for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:33:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from statler.isode.com (ext-bt.isode.com [217.34.220.158]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49101A86EA for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:33:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1418664815; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=6PU6NgyRVo83Z4p375lcq4lgeKw+s7wJ6LbQd4C/d4g=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=r1NUYsHSHSuYjXWAwahZa5gRIdBEjPU4K4vB4Ynk+ktrLfRpWEUtL91DkkY+6Q6eYJ+5AJ r72xTCRqRlg45WIt9s4furjoyQifebCDTyJlZrv/bYTGulzC3nuEHGEQ9hqEoI0A/arbT+ tngUYWZwwfgskRwkEZo6tCBW2gZ205c=;
Received: from [172.20.1.215] (dhcp-215.isode.net [172.20.1.215]) by statler.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <VI8bbAB3u2rT@statler.isode.com>; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 17:33:35 +0000
Message-ID: <548F1B65.4010707@isode.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 17:33:25 +0000
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
References: <CA+Vbu7ye3bytMZ-j8pfZixrjF8irTOoWmRo_GwjB0LphwjXq+Q@mail.gmail.com> <20141202092847.29027.qmail@cr.yp.to> <CA+Vbu7yQoYf3ei3MADhJ1iV6BcuqVUmkg8SkQ4ud=8m7pz7AvQ@mail.gmail.com> <D0B0DC9F.39BD0%kenny.paterson@rhul.ac.uk> <CACsn0c=uyPT6xa4CsXPeAV31QeeO+HfsCXAxt7Ba6NOt_Y2hiA@mail.gmail.com> <CABqy+sr1T-VwQx1NaRA+xvnqVn7smjs2+YrG2Uz1Q+8M6c3hng@mail.gmail.com> <BD65A1A0-82AD-4F16-909D-D354E7251835@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <BD65A1A0-82AD-4F16-909D-D354E7251835@vpnc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/Kml78xtVX-0KeQrNBGPzsnTBTgU
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Consensus and a way forward]
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 17:33:38 -0000

On 15/12/2014 16:04, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Robert's assertions are both surprising and troubling to me. Resolution of them would certainly affect my views on draft-black-rpgecc, particularly on the hole it has for implementation. These need to be discussed more thoroughly before we can move forwards on the document.
Agreed. On behalf of CFRG chairs, I would ask people not to comment on 
this thread until chairs have some time to discuss/investigate.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email