Return-Path: X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52108C14F6A3 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2024 04:45:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.104 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dyne.org Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y66khqTl7bQb for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2024 04:45:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.dyne.org (mx1.dyne.org [65.109.67.92]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1972C14F61A for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2024 04:45:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dyne.org; s=mail; t=1728647122; bh=HiJMP96dogB48einQ942Z1N/h1WEtGn2BWOPZ4OyFJY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ofzz7KovObzf6B0Sq08i4lnEqCwwKry+CojiAzxiEPq/wFgdlRt6cZM0yIY8HIOia 0yL5V0CuPZ86BEZSawbTgufrktM39IJXB6mQKXGaR9sg1+kBnJaHxDq1k7GOyrP4hY ijO4Xa7qSNKTV7JodBtx0u8zQq15e1UWpBpOU7iU= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: jaromil@dyne.org) with ESMTPSA id D69377E17AF Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 13:42:21 +0200 From: Jaromil To: cfrg@irtf.org Message-ID: <20241011114221.bahblkvehm62jpet@napoli> References: <20240823205242.c6kg3h652mrddoui@napoli> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20240823205242.c6kg3h652mrddoui@napoli> Message-ID-Hash: 5SLPUUJBWLFAYZCV3YZNLCNDY7QABKDX X-Message-ID-Hash: 5SLPUUJBWLFAYZCV3YZNLCNDY7QABKDX X-MailFrom: jaromil@dyne.org X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-cfrg.irtf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc5 Precedence: list Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BCFRG=5D_Re=3A_BBS+_benchmarks_v06?= List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Dear colleagues, I'm following up on the feedback I got by participants to the last W3C CCG in which I've presented my independent analysis on BBS+ v06. The benchmarks article is now updated, as well the code used to do the benchmarks, and available from the same site: https://news.dyne.org/benchmark-of-the-bbs-signature-scheme-v06/ The update includes the "Size" section now including the measurement of size growth with the growth of total credentials. As well a "Security Considerations" new section with a caveat for anyone implementing a BBS+ powered application. Ciao! -- Denis "Jaromil" Roio Dyne.org think &do tank Ph.D, CTO & founder software to empower communities ✉ Haparandadam 7-A1, 1013AK Amsterdam, The Netherlands 𝄞 crypto κρυπτο крипто क्रिप्टो 加密 التشفير הצפנה ⚷ 6113D89C A825C5CE DD02C872 73B35DA5 4ACB7D10