Re: [Cfrg] Requesting removal of CFRG co-chair

"Dan Harkins" <dharkins@lounge.org> Fri, 27 December 2013 23:12 UTC

Return-Path: <dharkins@lounge.org>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A88C81AE881 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 15:12:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.867
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.867 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s1QrzjZjpPOS for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 15:12:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from colo.trepanning.net (colo.trepanning.net [69.55.226.174]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D0FB1AE880 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 15:12:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from www.trepanning.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colo.trepanning.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E8C910224008; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 15:12:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 69.12.173.8 (SquirrelMail authenticated user dharkins@lounge.org) by www.trepanning.net with HTTP; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 15:12:33 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <80e37e621408caf49bd4e6ae666736f4.squirrel@www.trepanning.net>
In-Reply-To: <bee2b54d6a71371a3ca66e47c1bdd9bf.squirrel@www.trepanning.net>
References: <CAGZ8ZG2f9QHX40RcB8aajWvEfG0Gh_uewu2Rq7bQGHYNx6cOmw@mail.gmail.com> <52B91820.9090706@cisco.com> <CAGZ8ZG02+o=Qm0gUQiVF9H_=wfn+wQt8ahY1ntLHNsELXbvtVg@mail.gmail.com> <AA79A33E-D6B9-4693-A670-B4458011B394@cisco.com> <CA+cU71mTCVHAe2a46USJihr9ihPVw_vQTu0xk-mpRp41La88Xg@mail.gmail.com> <e4054b534e308e3c17c22ccf987d3edc.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <52B9EFBD.3030607@streamsec.se> <b50dd3dbb915affdb4bfbd13b4399693.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <B1141097-E3C7-485F-B719-1BA5AA0DDD06@checkpoint.com> <bee2b54d6a71371a3ca66e47c1bdd9bf.squirrel@www.trepanning.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 15:12:33 -0800 (PST)
From: "Dan Harkins" <dharkins@lounge.org>
To: "Dan Harkins" <dharkins@lounge.org>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.14 [SVN]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Cc: cfrg@irtf.org, henrick@streamsec.se
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Requesting removal of CFRG co-chair
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 23:12:41 -0000

  Yoav, Henrick (and probably others),

  It has been pointed out to me in private email that this sentence is
quite ambiguous:

>>>> On 2013-12-24 21:09, Dan Harkins wrote:
>>>>>   Realize too that had Kevin's employer not given these people the
>>>>> opportunity to strike their fashionable pose there would be no
>>>>> discussion
>>>>> of IRTF process or what the CFRG's place in the world is.

  I meant that Kevin's employer presented a convenient (and fashionably
popular) target to criticize. I did not mean that his employer was doing
anything to create the environment in which people can comfortably (or
fashionably) criticize.

  Hope this clears it up.

  regards,

  Dan.