Re: [Cfrg] When TLS is an overkill...

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 25 February 2019 17:16 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A35130F2B for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 09:16:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ds-Tb5zzk8xg for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 09:16:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B163130F33 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 09:16:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost2.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c8:406a:91ff:fe74:f2b7]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x1PHGTbV013401; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 18:16:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.217.106] (p54A6C2FE.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.166.194.254]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 447TBP0fRDz1Br6; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 18:16:29 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <b2c4dab3-e0d5-2d1b-83e5-5a2161321d07@openca.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 18:16:28 +0100
Cc: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com>, cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 572807786.360441-edf24925d46b7d8ceb92fa3e9a9f1311
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <06CD3312-C6C2-46C7-88E0-C5DF8B0A264A@tzi.org>
References: <307807bf-09eb-96c7-028f-df9573463b11@openca.org> <CAMr0u6k1Yc=TmNRte=ZhJ0aQ9th-YSSL9hzozgddzqxwXcXZPg@mail.gmail.com> <b2c4dab3-e0d5-2d1b-83e5-5a2161321d07@openca.org>
To: "Dr. Pala" <director@openca.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/LCsGu6tFDANdtm06lYSwSYy0Ic0>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] When TLS is an overkill...
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 17:16:41 -0000

On Feb 25, 2019, at 17:37, Dr. Pala <director@openca.org> wrote:
> 
> The specific I-D seems to be a bit too restrictive for a generic protocol

Well, that’s the point.

Flexibility is overrated.

Grüße, Carsten