From nobody Thu Apr 15 08:19:37 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C2D3A23C7 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 08:19:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.849 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.849 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FAKE_REPLY_B=1.269, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=apple.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZbhE6jL2YoVl for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 08:19:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rn-mailsvcp-ppex-lapp14.apple.com (rn-mailsvcp-ppex-lapp14.rno.apple.com [17.179.253.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 124153A23C5 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 08:19:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (rn-mailsvcp-ppex-lapp14.rno.apple.com [127.0.0.1]) by rn-mailsvcp-ppex-lapp14.rno.apple.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 13FFHctR026169 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 08:19:30 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apple.com; h=from : content-type : mime-version : subject : message-id : date : to; s=20180706; bh=G+YZO/271qiEPDrqRcEVk31zMrNFzbly7QMTBOkM/CY=; b=wGd+y5TRqljG5TIENxkhWXSs57zbX5JQhs4vch/KI5XLH3EqBQK5R1m07+BpFXoR7R9Z s3hnpn+gDqiRaVHh2PUNe4QGC928IHw9H/kOqzIf2lMc/ZzGYQ0fBIekauYuhQbwQ/bX svxaV09bUpqKGuNXCNbeS2QeyargbFE/qlM6WWrlsd+GtoeLKT39jLq1eypJ1p9vnvNn fqlOujC5tPrlq3BNImXNQNMC2ndt0SknXki0nDvvBzgjUhyqFvKSH4LmttkhUXKlsvXh egysB+3BuxaDRKfw0w51YlYAWHJjcWx4GMXejkzIiLrWHHvhIzr2+oiswmnCDiqgB3Ss Tw== Received: from rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp03.rno.apple.com (rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp03.rno.apple.com [10.225.203.151]) by rn-mailsvcp-ppex-lapp14.rno.apple.com with ESMTP id 37u8wbt0cv-6 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 08:19:30 -0700 Received: from rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp02.rno.apple.com (rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp02.rno.apple.com [17.179.253.15]) by rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp03.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.7.20201203 64bit (built Dec 3 2020)) with ESMTPS id <0QRM00O4Y2KHU790@rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp03.rno.apple.com> for cfrg@irtf.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 08:19:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from process_milters-daemon.rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp02.rno.apple.com by rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp02.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.7.20201203 64bit (built Dec 3 2020)) id <0QRM00H002H0YJ00@rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp02.rno.apple.com> for cfrg@irtf.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 08:19:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Va-A: X-Va-T-CD: 0a7aecb26c3b60e463e802dc6a15799c X-Va-E-CD: 69b619ea6a4fa15707b5e9f2ee2e688c X-Va-R-CD: 87cdfee91d48619045811dcbadea3ca6 X-Va-CD: 0 X-Va-ID: aab5c83b-8918-49b9-a7c4-67f3bba14745 X-V-A: X-V-T-CD: 0a7aecb26c3b60e463e802dc6a15799c X-V-E-CD: 69b619ea6a4fa15707b5e9f2ee2e688c X-V-R-CD: 87cdfee91d48619045811dcbadea3ca6 X-V-CD: 0 X-V-ID: 752b9b5c-6a59-4cb1-a34b-0923557cd980 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-04-15_06:2021-04-15, 2021-04-15 signatures=0 Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [17.234.4.247]) by rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp02.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.7.20201203 64bit (built Dec 3 2020)) with ESMTPSA id <0QRM00DDB2KG5V00@rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp02.rno.apple.com> for cfrg@irtf.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 08:19:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Tommy Pauly Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3723450A-0158-41F4-B053-7DFB9C07A6E2" MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3668.0.5\)) Message-id: <2CC204C1-ABDB-4029-A4AA-CA3C63077DD5@apple.com> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 08:19:28 -0700 To: cfrg@irtf.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3668.0.5) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-04-15_06:2021-04-15, 2021-04-15 signatures=0 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [CFRG] Call for adoption for draft-wood-cfrg-rsa-blind-signatures X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 15:19:35 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_3723450A-0158-41F4-B053-7DFB9C07A6E2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Apologies for the late note=E2=80=94 As an implementor using this spec, I wanted to speak up in favor of = adopting this document. As both Steven and Scott, having a standard = defined for a publicly verifiable blind signature will be very useful. = While having non-RSA alternatives in the future will be useful, having = an RSA version is something that can get done sooner and will prevent = value to deployments that want to use blind signatures soon. The authors of this document and I have a short draft that uses these = signatures as a proxy authentication method in HTTP, which is useful for = privacy-centric proxies such as the ones being discussed in the MASQUE = working group. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-privacy-token-00 = While this call hasn=E2=80=99t received a ton of input, the discussion = at the last meeting seemed to have good engagement, and the feedback = that has been given has been positive, so I=E2=80=99d like to see this = work progress. Best, Tommy On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 5:21 AM Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev = wrote: > Dear CFRG participants, > As a follow-up to the discussion at the recent CFRG meeting, this = email > commences a 3-week call for adoption for "RSA Blind Signatures" draft > (draft-wood-cfrg-rsa-blind-signatures-00) that will end on April 9th = 2021: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wood-cfrg-rsa-blind-signatures/ > > Please give your views on whether this document should be adopted as a > CFRG draft, and if so, whether you'd be willing to help work on = it/review > it. Please reply to this email (or in exceptional circumstances you = can > email CFRG chairs directly at cfrg-chairs@ietf.org). > > Thank you, > Stanislav (for the chairs) > _______________________________________________ > CFRG mailing list > CFRG@irtf.org > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg >= --Apple-Mail=_3723450A-0158-41F4-B053-7DFB9C07A6E2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Apologies for the late note=E2=80=94

As an implementor using this spec, I = wanted to speak up in favor of adopting this document. As both Steven = and Scott, having a standard defined for a publicly verifiable blind = signature will be very useful. While having non-RSA alternatives in the = future will be useful, having an RSA version is something that can get = done sooner and will prevent value to deployments that want to use blind = signatures soon.

The authors of this document and I have a short draft that = uses these signatures as a proxy authentication method in HTTP, which is = useful for privacy-centric proxies such as the ones being discussed in = the MASQUE working group.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-privacy-token-00

While this call = hasn=E2=80=99t received a ton of input, the discussion at the last = meeting seemed to have good engagement, and the feedback that has been = given has been positive, so I=E2=80=99d like to see this work = progress.

Best,
Tommy

On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 5:21 AM = Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <smyshsv@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear CFRG = participants,
> As a follow-up to the discussion = at the recent CFRG meeting, this email
> = commences a 3-week call for adoption for "RSA Blind Signatures" = draft
> = (draft-wood-cfrg-rsa-blind-signatures-00) that will end on April 9th = 2021:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wood-cfrg-rsa-blind-sign= atures/
>
> Please = give your views on whether this document should be adopted as = a
> CFRG draft, and if so, whether you'd be = willing to help work on it/review
> it. Please = reply to this email (or in exceptional circumstances you can
> email CFRG chairs directly at cfrg-chairs@ietf.org).
>
> Thank you,
> Stanislav (for the = chairs)
> = _______________________________________________
> = CFRG mailing list
> CFRG@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
>
= --Apple-Mail=_3723450A-0158-41F4-B053-7DFB9C07A6E2--