Re: [Cfrg] Comment on draft-irtf-cfrg-eddsa
Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com> Wed, 06 July 2016 19:27 UTC
Return-Path: <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22AF012D1D5 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 12:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fqjZyQK6HA8i for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 12:27:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from welho-filter4.welho.com (welho-filter4.welho.com [83.102.41.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E2112D1F0 for <cfrg@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 12:27:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by welho-filter4.welho.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E119E4DAE; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 22:27:12 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at pp.htv.fi
Received: from welho-smtp2.welho.com ([IPv6:::ffff:83.102.41.85]) by localhost (welho-filter4.welho.com [::ffff:83.102.41.26]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ITEisF96S7bO; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 22:27:12 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from LK-Perkele-V2 (87-100-177-32.bb.dnainternet.fi [87.100.177.32]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by welho-smtp2.welho.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F15621C; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 22:27:12 +0300 (EEST)
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 22:27:10 +0300
From: Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
Message-ID: <20160706192710.GA28197@LK-Perkele-V2.elisa-laajakaista.fi>
References: <058101d1d7b5$d605c5d0$82115170$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <058101d1d7b5$d605c5d0$82115170$@augustcellars.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)
Sender: ilariliusvaara@welho.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/LnZ9GDeHKvhHzERUJs3N2qXEpwY>
Resent-From: alias-bounces@ietf.org
Resent-To: <>
Cc: cfrg@ietf.org, draft-irtf-cfrg-eddsa@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Comment on draft-irtf-cfrg-eddsa
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 19:27:23 -0000
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 11:40:14AM -0700, Jim Schaad wrote: > I was going through the document doing a bad implementation and I ran across > the following issue. > > In Table 1 there is constant 'a' defined as being -1. > In section 5.1.6, the first step defines a new variable 'a'. As this is not > strongly highlighted, the variable is defined in the middle of a sentence, I > missed that it was being defined as I worked things out and had a problem. > > I would suggest that one or the other variables be re-named so that the > confusion does not exist. Renamed to 's' in Editor's Copy (that also seems to be the letter the generic EdDSA description used). -Ilari
- Re: [Cfrg] Comment on draft-irtf-cfrg-eddsa Ilari Liusvaara
- [Cfrg] Comment on draft-irtf-cfrg-eddsa Jim Schaad