Re: [CFRG] CFRG Digest, Vol 197, Issue 4

I also strongly support the acceptance of this proposal.
As no one might doubt here, pairing-friendly cryptography has lots of
interesting applications.
Moreover, a follow-up result by De Micheli, Gaudry, and Pierrot (
https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/707.pdf) shows the implementational
feasibility of my algorithm with Barbulescu.
For crypto-agility, I think there is no reason to delay the standardization
of this proposal.
I would be happy to see this proposal be standardized.

Best regards,
Taechan

2021년 9월 7일 (화) 오전 4:00, <cfrg-request@irtf.org>님이 작성:

> Send CFRG mailing list submissions to
>         cfrg@irtf.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         cfrg-request@irtf.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         cfrg-owner@irtf.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CFRG digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Second RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-pairing-friendly-curves
>       (Colin Perkins)
>    2. Re: Second RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-pairing-friendly-curves
>       (Yumi Sakemi)
>    3. Re: Second RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-pairing-friendly-curves
>       (Yumi Sakemi)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 14:20:39 +0100
> From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
> To: Michael Scott <mike.scott=40miracl.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> Cc: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com>, CFRG
>         <cfrg@irtf.org>
> Subject: Re: [CFRG] Second RGLC on
>         draft-irtf-cfrg-pairing-friendly-curves
> Message-ID: <6B079E60-5A57-444B-A620-E85A163CFEF8@csperkins.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> To clarify, since this issue comes up frequently: the CFRG is an IRTF
> research group, and does not develop standards.
>
> The pairing friendly curves draft is targeting publication as an
> Informational RFC.
>
> Colin
>
>
>
> > On 6 Sep 2021, at 08:41, Michael Scott <mike.scott=
> 40miracl.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> >
> > I would like to reiterate my support for this proposed standard. The
> authors have diligently responded to earlier feedback, the pairing-friendly
> curves proposed have not received any substantive criticism, and in some
> cases have already been widely adopted. Therefore in my view this draft
> standard is ready to progress.
> >
> > Mike Scott
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 4:40 PM Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <
> smyshsv@gmail.com <mailto:smyshsv@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > Dear CFRG participants,
> >
> > This message starts a second RGLC on "Pairing-Friendly Curves"
> (draft-irtf-cfrg-pairing-friendly-curves-10), that will end on September,
> 8th.
> >
> > See
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-cfrg-pairing-friendly-curves/
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-cfrg-pairing-friendly-curves/>
> for the latest version of the draft.
> >
> > We are having the second RGLC since Yumi Sakemi has provided (see
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/-1nTbbVRlkP5wV2odEYFac-jK08/ <
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/-1nTbbVRlkP5wV2odEYFac-jK08/>)
> updated replies for the questions raised after the first RGLC.
> >
> > Please send your comments, as well as expression of support to publish
> as an RFC (or possible reasons for not doing so) in reply to this message
> or directly to CFRG chairs.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Stanislav, Nick and Alexey
> > _______________________________________________
> > CFRG mailing list
> > CFRG@irtf.org <mailto:CFRG@irtf.org>
> > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg <
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>
> > _______________________________________________
> > CFRG mailing list
> > CFRG@irtf.org
> > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
>
>
> --
> Colin Perkins
> https://csperkins.org/
>
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/attachments/20210906/643453d2/attachment.htm
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 23:26:31 +0900
> From: Yumi Sakemi <yumi.sakemi@infours.co.jp>
> To: Michael Scott <mike.scott=40miracl.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> Cc: CFRG <cfrg@irtf.org>, SAITO Tsunekazu
>         <tsunekazu.saito.hg@hco.ntt.co.jp>,  Tetsutaro Kobayashi
>         <tetsutaro.kobayashi.dr@hco.ntt.co.jp>
> Subject: Re: [CFRG] Second RGLC on
>         draft-irtf-cfrg-pairing-friendly-curves
> Message-ID:
>         <
> CAA4D8KZdRoHHy-ZHwMHe4+ZHgtPtcqhM9uWe_TjK64OKnTov2A@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Dear Prof. Scott
>
> I appreciate your support and encouraging messages about our
> activities of pairing-friendly curves.
>
> Best regards,
> Yumi
>
> 2021?9?6?(?) 22:21 Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>:
> >
> > To clarify, since this issue comes up frequently: the CFRG is an IRTF
> research group, and does not develop standards.
> >
> > The pairing friendly curves draft is targeting publication as an
> Informational RFC.
> >
> > Colin
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6 Sep 2021, at 08:41, Michael Scott <mike.scott=
> 40miracl.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> >
> > I would like to reiterate my support for this proposed standard. The
> authors have diligently responded to earlier feedback, the pairing-friendly
> curves proposed have not received any substantive criticism, and in some
> cases have already been widely adopted. Therefore in my view this draft
> standard is ready to progress.
> >
> > Mike Scott
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 4:40 PM Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <
> smyshsv@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear CFRG participants,
> >>
> >> This message starts a second RGLC on "Pairing-Friendly Curves"
> (draft-irtf-cfrg-pairing-friendly-curves-10), that will end on September,
> 8th.
> >>
> >> See
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-cfrg-pairing-friendly-curves/
> for the latest version of the draft.
> >>
> >> We are having the second RGLC since Yumi Sakemi has provided (see
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/-1nTbbVRlkP5wV2odEYFac-jK08/)
> updated replies for the questions raised after the first RGLC.
> >>
> >> Please send your comments, as well as expression of support to publish
> as an RFC (or possible reasons for not doing so) in reply to this message
> or directly to CFRG chairs.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Stanislav, Nick and Alexey
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> CFRG mailing list
> >> CFRG@irtf.org
> >> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CFRG mailing list
> > CFRG@irtf.org
> > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
> >
> >
> > --
> > Colin Perkins
> > https://csperkins.org/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CFRG mailing list
> > CFRG@irtf.org
> > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
>
>
>
> --
> Yumi Sakemi, Ph. D.
>  Infours Inc.
>
> E-Mail: yumi.sakemi@infours.co.jp
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 23:49:49 +0900
> From: Yumi Sakemi <yumi.sakemi@infours.co.jp>
> To: csp@csperkins.org
> Cc: CFRG <cfrg@irtf.org>, SAITO Tsunekazu
>         <tsunekazu.saito.hg@hco.ntt.co.jp>,  Tetsutaro Kobayashi
>         <tetsutaro.kobayashi.dr@hco.ntt.co.jp>
> Subject: Re: [CFRG] Second RGLC on
>         draft-irtf-cfrg-pairing-friendly-curves
> Message-ID:
>         <CAA4D8Kbvg+Zj5WAP2xOCV0rT8cYFD1FzFEA_h=
> P2rwRmGeFRRQ@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Dear Prof. Colin Perkins
>
> Thank you for clarifying our situation/status of activities with
> accurate information.
>
> Best regards,
> Yumi
>
> 2021?9?6?(?) 23:26 Yumi Sakemi <yumi.sakemi@infours.co.jp>:
> >
> > Dear Prof. Scott
> >
> > I appreciate your support and encouraging messages about our
> > activities of pairing-friendly curves.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Yumi
> >
> > 2021?9?6?(?) 22:21 Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>:
> > >
> > > To clarify, since this issue comes up frequently: the CFRG is an IRTF
> research group, and does not develop standards.
> > >
> > > The pairing friendly curves draft is targeting publication as an
> Informational RFC.
> > >
> > > Colin
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 6 Sep 2021, at 08:41, Michael Scott <mike.scott=
> 40miracl.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > I would like to reiterate my support for this proposed standard. The
> authors have diligently responded to earlier feedback, the pairing-friendly
> curves proposed have not received any substantive criticism, and in some
> cases have already been widely adopted. Therefore in my view this draft
> standard is ready to progress.
> > >
> > > Mike Scott
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 4:40 PM Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <
> smyshsv@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Dear CFRG participants,
> > >>
> > >> This message starts a second RGLC on "Pairing-Friendly Curves"
> (draft-irtf-cfrg-pairing-friendly-curves-10), that will end on September,
> 8th.
> > >>
> > >> See
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-cfrg-pairing-friendly-curves/
> for the latest version of the draft.
> > >>
> > >> We are having the second RGLC since Yumi Sakemi has provided (see
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/-1nTbbVRlkP5wV2odEYFac-jK08/)
> updated replies for the questions raised after the first RGLC.
> > >>
> > >> Please send your comments, as well as expression of support to
> publish as an RFC (or possible reasons for not doing so) in reply to this
> message or directly to CFRG chairs.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Stanislav, Nick and Alexey
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> CFRG mailing list
> > >> CFRG@irtf.org
> > >> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > CFRG mailing list
> > > CFRG@irtf.org
> > > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Colin Perkins
> > > https://csperkins.org/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > CFRG mailing list
> > > CFRG@irtf.org
> > > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Yumi Sakemi, Ph. D.
> >  Infours Inc.
> >
> > E-Mail: yumi.sakemi@infours.co.jp
>
>
>
> --
> Yumi Sakemi, Ph. D.
>  Infours Inc.
>
> E-Mail: yumi.sakemi@infours.co.jp
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> CFRG mailing list
> CFRG@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of CFRG Digest, Vol 197, Issue 4
> ************************************
>