IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CFRG] Please review draft-ietf-drip-rid

Robert Moskowitz <rgm-sec@htt-consult.com> Fri, 17 September 2021 17:33 UTC

Return-Path: <rgm-sec@htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E26E83A09E3 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 10:33:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bpVqCVm6PXPZ for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 10:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [23.123.122.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 821D43A09E1 for <cfrg@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 10:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A816250B; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 13:32:44 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at htt-consult.com
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id zXgPnLqF4gJi; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 13:32:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lx140e.htt-consult.com (unknown [192.168.160.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A2BCD623C1; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 13:32:39 -0400 (EDT)
To: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Cc: cfrg@ietf.org
References: <03b5ea0e-cf1a-8edf-d642-2fb4b2e458fd@htt-consult.com> <CACsn0ckZbA4=Xe+Lc1w5bc5os8Ekeh9q7AAxknknwrrBZ0R-KQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm-sec@htt-consult.com>
Message-ID: <bafe584e-4e42-1d53-34da-05d2fd2cc836@htt-consult.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 13:33:38 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CACsn0ckZbA4=Xe+Lc1w5bc5os8Ekeh9q7AAxknknwrrBZ0R-KQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/NSRrSKn7smr526K_m01OkuE2fmQ>
Subject: Re: [CFRG] Please review draft-ietf-drip-rid
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 17:33:52 -0000

Watson,

There is more than just a cert chain.  I have looked into this approach 
at the beginning and ruled it out.  If you wish to discuss this further, 
I am open to doing that, if nothing more than checking that I did make 
an informed choice.

On 9/17/21 9:58 AM, Watson Ladd wrote:
> I've read your email and have only one response.
>
> Why?
>
> There is enough room for an entire certificate chain using Ed25519 and
> compact encodings. That would be a lot simpler.
>
> Sincerely,
> Watson Ladd
>
> --
> Astra mortemque praestare gradatim
>
> _______________________________________________
> CFRG mailing list
> CFRG@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status