Re: [Cfrg] draft-ladd-safecurves-02
Alyssa Rowan <akr@akr.io> Sat, 11 January 2014 16:24 UTC
Return-Path: <akr@akr.io>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F72F1AE062 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 08:24:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hza4-kalhORX for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 08:24:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from entima.net (entima.net [78.129.143.175]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC31E1AE05C for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 08:24:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.10.42.10] (cpc5-derb12-2-0-cust796.8-3.cable.virginm.net [82.31.91.29]) by entima.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C06060392 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 16:24:39 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <52D17058.1050200@akr.io>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 16:24:56 +0000
From: Alyssa Rowan <akr@akr.io>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cfrg@irtf.org
References: <20140111003703.6111382.10153.8425@certicom.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140111003703.6111382.10153.8425@certicom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] draft-ladd-safecurves-02
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 16:24:54 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 11/01/2014 00:37, Dan Brown wrote: > I'm going to try to write up to CFRG my disagreements soon. I am quite sure I shall find them interesting. > Maybe I'm old school, but I'd expect references to be stable and > dated. Agreed there. That's a temporary slot, there for the draft, I believe, but the final reference should I think be more like: 7. References [SAFECURVES] Daniel J. Bernstein and Tanja Lange. SafeCurves: choosing safe curves for elliptic-curve cryptography. <http://safecurves.cr.yp.to>, accessed 11 November 2014. [EFD] Daniel J. Bernstein and Tanja Lange. Explict-Formulas Database, Genus-1 curves over large-characteristic fields. <http://www.hyperelliptic.org/EFD/g1p/>, accessed 11 November 2014. Oddly, archive.org hasn't saved the most recent version. I don't expect it to disappear, but this RFC is of course going to be around for a long time. If anyone knows of a better way to formally cite a webpage in an informational RFC, please say so; there's very likely already a process for that which I'm unfamiliar with? > […] it might help for the spec to state the CFRG's rationale for > accepting these curves. More practically, ideal would be to advise > users of the advantages and disadvantages of these curves, over > others. Section 1 of the draft would appear to meet that need quite well already. I'm comfortable with it as it stands. - -- /akr -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJS0XBYAAoJEOyEjtkWi2t60RkQAKGUdv2inZjuoZ8fIfcP3Kyd aLasvzlkKp1xqALAcIIeGjq292/StR5pyplA5b9M6tlDRZsixkAvsWIPMRlIHwuZ pVYuipftVeeV6hQU8GpeU+neGHap1QlyLeQkLNM5MaNiNbB+kSEMiPKtDEjmvBMw 6paRX3qhRfK/8pes2qQ4pjJbgqJFoxbg0+NLJqNMJSlpA7nsYk4ewVmP3JqHPmgX g2BYs/rN/ofJppUtADkQjndql2Gxh4e3k7ak7j5ygr4xraMUvpVbBk7HhMDmgTAD 9QvL3/i2kFF64EhFeZk4FKCQberJcG+XyoVOO9S8k4jguGJhzc/kM1Q+tt0eE8yw xq6Ex3XcXExcrtdePVmCCIws1iWR9+UH0xtI9LotgCNaNk52nBt2yqhXM4w3+oHL ElcgSJ5RxjFmLea+NXjxcJ0yD+LvH8GEnMDU0Dw8iNagrUbfqs46SC+PZ5CeNcdj yaADeAd0GfhI+7eu7awUqPH+skymEQriBaHMuDXcNT8vtycgNHiz8Tte8JsLW7wl ybmwPuBP+hT12XZTmtqcNDPyh7bOVhjxDzkKslAW9SICIsKVeYoOBzVPyJERCxZa 3pNbi9lwIQ3+ZZD1firKaHZbdmhcx/jmRkbS75bVUzdYtnZUTv17Mto46Gv8uq49 ueXqYMhe1NWHDo9I0b/W =U/Ye -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [Cfrg] draft-ladd-safecurves-02 Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-ladd-safecurves-02 Trevor Perrin
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-ladd-safecurves-02 Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-ladd-safecurves-02 Alyssa Rowan
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-ladd-safecurves-02 Michael Hamburg
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-ladd-safecurves-02 Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-ladd-safecurves-02 Dan Brown
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-ladd-safecurves-02 Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-ladd-safecurves-02 Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-ladd-safecurves-02 Robert Ransom
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-ladd-safecurves-02 Alyssa Rowan
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-ladd-safecurves-02 Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-ladd-safecurves-02 Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-ladd-safecurves-02 Robert Ransom
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-ladd-safecurves-02 David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-ladd-safecurves-02 Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-ladd-safecurves-02 Dan Harkins