Re: [Cfrg] A2 versus A^2 and BB verus AA
Tanja Lange <tanja@hyperelliptic.org> Sat, 10 January 2015 20:42 UTC
Return-Path: <tanja@hyperelliptic.org>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4571D1A8860 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 12:42:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.195
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.195 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l-62JvHLYIvl for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 12:42:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from calvin.win.tue.nl (calvin.win.tue.nl [131.155.70.11]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 780B71A87C9 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 12:42:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 3198 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2015 20:42:45 -0000
Received: from pcdhz005.win.tue.nl (HELO hyperelliptic.org) (131.155.71.33) by calvin.win.tue.nl with SMTP; 10 Jan 2015 20:42:45 -0000
Received: (qmail 18291 invoked by uid 1000); 10 Jan 2015 20:42:27 -0000
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 21:42:27 +0100
From: Tanja Lange <tanja@hyperelliptic.org>
To: Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org>
Message-ID: <20150110204227.GF11760@cph.win.tue.nl>
References: <D0D6B088.5815C%paul@marvell.com> <CAMfhd9XTQB-QjMpkW9PQ1e7NaV5jc56KfRP12i6WLaiNGqUyRg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMfhd9XTQB-QjMpkW9PQ1e7NaV5jc56KfRP12i6WLaiNGqUyRg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/OFiigW6ji4jrnNayCVrL7HF5_R4>
Cc: "simon@josefsson.org" <simon@josefsson.org>, "mpg@elzevir.fr" <mpg@elzevir.fr>, "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>, "agl@google.com" <agl@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] A2 versus A^2 and BB verus AA
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 20:42:28 -0000
> Whether it works out or not, it's good to match EFD. I've updated the > draft in GitHub to match, thanks! > This is not a typo, it is using a different (better) definition of the curve constant which is what the implementations use. Tanja
- [Cfrg] A2 versus A^2 and BB verus AA Paul Lambert
- Re: [Cfrg] A2 versus A^2 and BB verus AA Adam Langley
- Re: [Cfrg] A2 versus A^2 and BB verus AA Samuel Neves
- Re: [Cfrg] A2 versus A^2 and BB verus AA Tanja Lange
- Re: [Cfrg] A2 versus A^2 and BB verus AA Adam Langley
- Re: [Cfrg] A2 versus A^2 and BB verus AA Tanja Lange
- Re: [Cfrg] A2 versus A^2 and BB verus AA Samuel Neves
- Re: [Cfrg] A2 versus A^2 and BB verus AA Tanja Lange