Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific curve around 256bit work factor (ends on February 23rd)
Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Fri, 20 February 2015 06:30 UTC
Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170751A6FED for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:30:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iEE19WqRFJu2 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:30:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yh0-x236.google.com (mail-yh0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42B0D1A0197 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:30:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by yhzz6 with SMTP id z6so2496036yhz.5 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:30:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=bFdOekvkTjyTcgXtcchCv/wMoqtCCq2Zk0TBHyfcnEs=; b=NASZleFXSTfPmuenPeADMiuXzFEHHmvcnNQkjJEub3Y1W3N5u1RZr5ZvhySxZ03IqH SzMP5Xrrrgvkm7tRdGv9uAB6bL86NJwHf2h0c3UekTrtpGE0dOV6bCYsDbU/67XzwCwK 1cN7A6epFm6GADD902boXDJbGihkzHABfrX9+m3ApOm7eRN6PeDOziKj3Tf4Q7fnO74Y W9jZKkDm8z5rOjPaXCfL382QIQR7sG2ueviVCyGewCnfxGpN6929NQRX9pkRiqqh21xY oc50XNO0Ply9myrLuLOQ1OwDSj+t4JUsF8fTf+g9pDt/QfXFJuHaVHFenJTqhTUwG+Ua zJwA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.236.18.194 with SMTP id l42mr5439571yhl.172.1424413849397; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:30:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.170.126.10 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:30:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <54E46EA4.9010002@isode.com>
References: <54E46EA4.9010002@isode.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:30:49 -0800
Message-ID: <CACsn0cmukCkRanLxekEUtt3RDcXxcP4YuNDmzrEiSkinnFHXcA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/PkeCkUzQ-SqXXQDnlGx4Y0-7dW4>
Cc: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific curve around 256bit work factor (ends on February 23rd)
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 06:30:52 -0000
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 2:51 AM, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote: > CFRG chairs are starting another poll: > > Q3: (For people who want CFRG to recommend a curve at 256bit level) Is > bandwidth cost of going to p521 worth the speed win over primes closer to > 512 bits? Yes. The arguments for 2^512-whatever are specious, and the performance advantage of 2^521-1 is the only thing that makes it a plausible alternative to Goldilocks. (I don't understand why we aren't voting on Goldilocks) > > > Once this issues is settled, we will be discussing implementation specifics > and coordinate systems for Diffie-Hellman. We will then make decisions on > signature schemes. Please don't discuss any of these future topics at this > time. > > _______________________________________________ > Cfrg mailing list > Cfrg@irtf.org > http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg -- "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin
- [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific curve a… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Alyssa Rowan
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Aaron Zauner
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Dan Harkins
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Tony Arcieri
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… James Cloos
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Jon Callas
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Mike Hamburg
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Adam Langley
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Jon Callas
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Russ Housley
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Tony Arcieri
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Paterson, Kenny
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Michael Hamburg
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Blumenthal, Uri - 0558 - MITLL
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Michael Hamburg
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Alyssa Rowan
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Tony Arcieri
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Tony Arcieri
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Jon Callas
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Damien Miller
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Damien Miller
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Tony Arcieri
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Michael Scott
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Paterson, Kenny
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Paterson, Kenny
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Torsten Schuetze
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Alyssa Rowan
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Aaron Zauner
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Kurt Roeckx
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Andrey Jivsov
- [Cfrg] network traffic D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [Cfrg] network traffic Kurt Roeckx
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Simon Josefsson
- Re: [Cfrg] network traffic RONDEPIERRE Franck
- Re: [Cfrg] network traffic David Jacobson
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Damien Miller
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Michael Hamburg
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… Michael Hamburg
- Re: [Cfrg] network traffic Kurt Roeckx
- Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific cur… _MiW