Re: [Cfrg] Requesting removal of CFRG co-chair

"Dan Harkins" <dharkins@lounge.org> Sun, 22 December 2013 08:22 UTC

Return-Path: <dharkins@lounge.org>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF741AE033 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 00:22:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.867
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.867 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0ZJFNFjAA-qo for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 00:22:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from colo.trepanning.net (colo.trepanning.net [69.55.226.174]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E541ADFF3 for <cfrg@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 00:22:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from www.trepanning.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colo.trepanning.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 676DD10224008; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 00:22:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 69.12.173.8 (SquirrelMail authenticated user dharkins@lounge.org) by www.trepanning.net with HTTP; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 00:22:33 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <8ac4396af38c4be34935361ed36ca5f6.squirrel@www.trepanning.net>
In-Reply-To: <CACsn0ckpB+9GHHb37xJ6BrpK3SL1aPe2-_nPwbDZKMAjMFg0Sg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201312212237.rBLMbo5i016331@sylvester.rhmr.com> <5FA05FD6-59A5-40EC-A3F6-A542E37C3224@taoeffect.com> <31D844CE-CCC8-4A4A-90A1-064D7B205E13@taoeffect.com> <CEDB64D7.2B148%paul@marvell.com> <CACsn0ckpB+9GHHb37xJ6BrpK3SL1aPe2-_nPwbDZKMAjMFg0Sg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 00:22:33 -0800 (PST)
From: "Dan Harkins" <dharkins@lounge.org>
To: "Watson Ladd" <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.14 [SVN]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Cc: "cfrg@ietf.org" <cfrg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Requesting removal of CFRG co-chair
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 08:22:43 -0000

On Sat, December 21, 2013 4:38 pm, Watson Ladd wrote:
> The CFRG cochair does not have the ability to declare the result of a
> last call that
> never happened because he personally supports a proposal.

  Huh?

> The purpose of the CFRG is not to create standards. It is to advance the
> usage
> of cryptography and improve the security of the Internet. The abuses of
> process
> committed by Kevin directly harm that goal by enabling a protocol to
> shortcut
> the LC process in the CFRG, and thus avoid serious discussion.

  What process are you talking about? There was no LC declared and
certainly no process that required one before an answer could be
provided back to the TLS WG.

  You seem to have invented a process, declared Kevin Igoe in violation
of it, and concocted a conspiracy theory to explain it all.

  Dan.