Re: [CFRG] Second RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-pairing-friendly-curves

Yumi Sakemi <yumi.sakemi@infours.co.jp> Mon, 06 September 2021 14:50 UTC

Return-Path: <yumi.sakemi@lepidum.co.jp>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922283A111E for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 07:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infours-co-jp.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sXirkupDN7Xq for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 07:50:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22d.google.com (mail-oi1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60DD63A111A for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 07:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id bi4so9081533oib.9 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 07:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infours-co-jp.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=x2HhvLyVfYITQTJASvTU4qVwR6OrkqXcfoeIJCnzhwo=; b=eW9gBvA2vydnRCLKN9Hkqgz1rhZ53CxoBpnsqfwMOzM4/ni43YK7UJBj6aaUZsb2HL b4sVjCetK1gW/mx8dXE46crUnaFXuHCLGQ92SsnNaLkc+lPtAdGPngZ7qxtTnbnwRkrM Fy1/e0Qfd0w9VM467w83oitaQK1KhBjbsCKBq58Q3jlupZc30h0lYVzvJM9h0tpzfUxq qmbHYVZCHp8vRUKRaAtxiVhXfhiqQ/itGUxKj+WFWHZ4UX1BG4cps0jOQOpuupC1sAD2 fqSpb5dWq/GkW+q0RUXBxZUx3pIIstHyS7uAo5fA22imv7W/TGMvNUv+h/dNFt4pA4mQ JCVg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=x2HhvLyVfYITQTJASvTU4qVwR6OrkqXcfoeIJCnzhwo=; b=GH0aXEjBLyxhxQ0tmada+eVZJ9aBiTE9VWZgWodtLCj5G1+LzncrhkkY9SvlkzeC17 YsEDfqBalC4HTDJxcCKV2JK/TZLXRRUPoyJqc4GD1rp6vpk1ucUMel/8cgvmGB1KwXui qlK35XyiKKsUMqWuKmIrB9YBlcTdm8P+pv1mugW7x8l/uWJfTRy9fhRlCk3rR71yV5nH 3KlkpbTL2CDcxuIHCQV3QMGelGiqMB60DouzSN8bqCeaJEr5yaQiG0dwma5yboZXQ9Kx rZFHaLOVfqemxaf3PjIQ60d25jZ31hzTD24lOgqF9o9pdZpNBNr8/RYLyOv8kdY/Owre BdOA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532HFVD7nLfK8/XN+0pwO/e6PUNei5bUqjsIN15TH5wFPfN4atKS PP33v7e6qkFGBBhydlz0GuduvsZ5DsAC376bRcGK+Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxPcLbQ0rzP5gw21riiWNoges3mOidlFivYLxDHoTAj95oY0x+l8RzkgSJ4JbuVN0WcbnoLVlA25b8dZJfR+Vo=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:7ce:: with SMTP id f14mr8598446oij.119.1630939799877; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 07:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMr0u6kV-YsAuAMRh6OVArhZ6DftZSCumqYNOQQ5BWq0cgxW3Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAEseHRp=arSCUtFb5orJ2pVyWU08_FWgnm2y_DeNKnTHU6XNRQ@mail.gmail.com> <6B079E60-5A57-444B-A620-E85A163CFEF8@csperkins.org> <CAA4D8KZdRoHHy-ZHwMHe4+ZHgtPtcqhM9uWe_TjK64OKnTov2A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA4D8KZdRoHHy-ZHwMHe4+ZHgtPtcqhM9uWe_TjK64OKnTov2A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Yumi Sakemi <yumi.sakemi@infours.co.jp>
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 23:49:49 +0900
Message-ID: <CAA4D8Kbvg+Zj5WAP2xOCV0rT8cYFD1FzFEA_h=P2rwRmGeFRRQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: csp@csperkins.org
Cc: CFRG <cfrg@irtf.org>, SAITO Tsunekazu <tsunekazu.saito.hg@hco.ntt.co.jp>, Tetsutaro Kobayashi <tetsutaro.kobayashi.dr@hco.ntt.co.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/RTdV6oD_rDz1DrS-zqHn37NQnME>
Subject: Re: [CFRG] Second RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-pairing-friendly-curves
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 14:50:08 -0000

Dear Prof. Colin Perkins

Thank you for clarifying our situation/status of activities with
accurate information.

Best regards,
Yumi

2021年9月6日(月) 23:26 Yumi Sakemi <yumi.sakemi@infours.co.jp>jp>:
>
> Dear Prof. Scott
>
> I appreciate your support and encouraging messages about our
> activities of pairing-friendly curves.
>
> Best regards,
> Yumi
>
> 2021年9月6日(月) 22:21 Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>rg>:
> >
> > To clarify, since this issue comes up frequently: the CFRG is an IRTF research group, and does not develop standards.
> >
> > The pairing friendly curves draft is targeting publication as an Informational RFC.
> >
> > Colin
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6 Sep 2021, at 08:41, Michael Scott <mike.scott=40miracl.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> >
> > I would like to reiterate my support for this proposed standard. The authors have diligently responded to earlier feedback, the pairing-friendly curves proposed have not received any substantive criticism, and in some cases have already been widely adopted. Therefore in my view this draft standard is ready to progress.
> >
> > Mike Scott
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 4:40 PM Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <smyshsv@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear CFRG participants,
> >>
> >> This message starts a second RGLC on "Pairing-Friendly Curves" (draft-irtf-cfrg-pairing-friendly-curves-10), that will end on September, 8th.
> >>
> >> See https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-cfrg-pairing-friendly-curves/ for the latest version of the draft.
> >>
> >> We are having the second RGLC since Yumi Sakemi has provided (see https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/-1nTbbVRlkP5wV2odEYFac-jK08/) updated replies for the questions raised after the first RGLC.
> >>
> >> Please send your comments, as well as expression of support to publish as an RFC (or possible reasons for not doing so) in reply to this message or directly to CFRG chairs.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Stanislav, Nick and Alexey
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> CFRG mailing list
> >> CFRG@irtf.org
> >> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CFRG mailing list
> > CFRG@irtf.org
> > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
> >
> >
> > --
> > Colin Perkins
> > https://csperkins.org/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CFRG mailing list
> > CFRG@irtf.org
> > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
>
>
>
> --
> Yumi Sakemi, Ph. D.
>  Infours Inc.
>
> E-Mail: yumi.sakemi@infours.co.jp



-- 
Yumi Sakemi, Ph. D.
 Infours Inc.

E-Mail: yumi.sakemi@infours.co.jp