Re: [Cfrg] Ristretto VRF? (was: I-D Action: draft-irtf-cfrg-vrf-04.txt)
Leonid Reyzin <reyzin@cs.bu.edu> Wed, 13 February 2019 02:07 UTC
Return-Path: <leonid.reyzin@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988BD130E2E; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 18:07:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.88
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.018, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9TwsgHSI1qAe; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 18:07:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it1-f179.google.com (mail-it1-f179.google.com [209.85.166.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 089131295EC; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 18:07:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it1-f179.google.com with SMTP id x131so737139itc.3; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 18:07:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UEtK0RlBnpZdtk6yZffAldBSiGAZeBEJwyj9Q7+n19Y=; b=EovG50WeT0Lggo9J51rhnmmYFsKr3MwZG8zjUNqAocE276ZWvokerR/YvV8E0XSpcm BzJE7k9Bgr2GBlCO6niGQn3HR3zLKfBMPbEA7DxdPYRiKRU39DXF5rK1dMdvad/XbvQL gLVAViLUwNzTzBaXEx4OHQ8WG8gn6KTnn3kXlG2MBY2N4QI7xB8Up/CIALi1WYS0u8sx JYYxZ8YW41ucFVHJlttC1fI9S7v4RFYejGFGYcDXqsGCk8fOOCv1unCuwKWudjX1Zend vVGIKVO2/7hM4v3YjX+KsSPksB0nmV22Ko2poFmeAqwprBQWVQ67M5XoJNId0zg0l5lP 69eQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuZqgU1QF9IJoM8z2/dorxhJWBiZ0Nx/wIw4ORJo31wcvy2KTa5z r4NUmOxyqJ0y0iaOcqObYMnrvNfk/YtqAY/d6SM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IZ4TJ6x6uTHTxiPvtz2AhFfkCeiTZP8jYyZOJEYtwunqWI95qC4FEdMHeK2mfe7WHU3XsUNWLLF7grEs5uLiys=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9a98:: with SMTP id c24mr4020540iom.227.1550023636945; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 18:07:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <154966511134.31100.13600074360506019628@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAHOTMVJiSSOHxqbhDwNAc4hLEuAh4S39y7e8_vX7Ck_jut7sNA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHOTMVJiSSOHxqbhDwNAc4hLEuAh4S39y7e8_vX7Ck_jut7sNA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Leonid Reyzin <reyzin@cs.bu.edu>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:06:50 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHZ6D0u==PX0=K6yPuYBcPTrxkV508=8dEhL0s3Kb8AWZzr_WA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com>
Cc: cfrg@ietf.org, i-d-announce@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004612980581bd00de"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/RcMfkK-qaVAIo8R0pf2qhfeIsfw>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Ristretto VRF? (was: I-D Action: draft-irtf-cfrg-vrf-04.txt)
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 02:07:21 -0000
Thanks, Tony! Yes, a Ristretto VRF makes sense, probably at the same time as the Ristretto draft moves forward. On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 6:09 PM Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm curious... with a Ristretto draft now available[1], would it be worth > considering the inclusion of a Ristretto VRF in draft-irtf-cfrg-vrf? > > From a "running code" perspective, implementing the ECVRF described in > this draft in terms of Ristretto is something that is already > happening[2][3]. > > [1]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hdevalence-cfrg-ristretto-00 > [2]: > https://github.com/CleverCloud/biscuit/blob/master/DESIGN.md#elliptic-curve-verifiable-random-functions > [3]: https://github.com/CleverCloud/biscuit/pull/10 > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 2:32 PM <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote: > >> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >> directories. >> This draft is a work item of the Crypto Forum RG of the IRTF. >> >> Title : Verifiable Random Functions (VRFs) >> Authors : Sharon Goldberg >> Leonid Reyzin >> Dimitrios Papadopoulos >> Jan Vcelak >> Filename : draft-irtf-cfrg-vrf-04.txt >> Pages : 42 >> Date : 2019-02-08 >> >> Abstract: >> A Verifiable Random Function (VRF) is the public-key version of a >> keyed cryptographic hash. Only the holder of the private key can >> compute the hash, but anyone with public key can verify the >> correctness of the hash. VRFs are useful for preventing enumeration >> of hash-based data structures. This document specifies several VRF >> constructions that are secure in the cryptographic random oracle >> model. One VRF uses RSA and the other VRF uses Eliptic Curves (EC). >> >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-cfrg-vrf/ >> >> There are also htmlized versions available at: >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-cfrg-vrf-04 >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-irtf-cfrg-vrf-04 >> >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-irtf-cfrg-vrf-04 >> >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >> submission >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Cfrg mailing list >> Cfrg@irtf.org >> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg >> > > > -- > Tony Arcieri > _______________________________________________ > Cfrg mailing list > Cfrg@irtf.org > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg >
- [Cfrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-cfrg-vrf-04.txt internet-drafts
- [Cfrg] Ristretto VRF? (was: I-D Action: draft-irt… Tony Arcieri
- Re: [Cfrg] Ristretto VRF? (was: I-D Action: draft… Leonid Reyzin