Re: [CFRG] Please review draft-ietf-drip-rid

Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Fri, 17 September 2021 14:24 UTC

Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C12253A1B25 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 07:24:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zlorl_RI6Hk7 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 07:24:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com (mail-ed1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 772143A1B22 for <cfrg@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 07:24:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id t6so30702386edi.9 for <cfrg@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 07:24:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=G6wkv6q59OLDQuHvmCKxH70TbAnAykb6L5LsEP7eg24=; b=Stm/+8D7ZQ7GepUq4eHs3hrf5Bmv8rFwhalFE88a6bB/DTSMkRasrfoffnsu3Equ9L 74YT305NfJlwgBN70ZQd2d7rGpXEvtzUATw0/WthpJ6LjnOsk3e8XfQIBWjZAYel3RfM Z1kI94ErxDch/zKgHnZeZ3ZS1nKLzTq0u9cm83RPN2jIoYjGjD9eI4vkawPwm0y0MQs7 c29Y/SamThTtbADXoZaY1dw3zTLo75e43G6yBKBcsdokQl0MQRg4B0dgoe3z6DbuCQ96 G+t5h5Mes+Dk9cRs1TdQc9qCOHZE3OvEcYaN1/fmGB4Htvijjf4a1dBkMF8pCovaE9Qt 9cwQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=G6wkv6q59OLDQuHvmCKxH70TbAnAykb6L5LsEP7eg24=; b=d7ybRZtj2Zbi5+qANYl8pMLG4k4MdtPIhbYRFjfFIuVxTQMawB2BXKe6YKfFv6D3Br Kj1JaO1a12NR1RMpJqnpogPuOovB/uFvAk+BAIIazlZeloWZ2n5zdBJXRFai3keFJT7H UGTUIA4XbswmHihObRdGBlLF1UAxUMtFv0xkiJ7CQTBqjQ9L3HDUUOndGH0qncHOjtq5 onGNo/JzpSgOOtAP+hqJ84bHIlkTGdB025C6Gy1jyx4lkwlzEgprwlJqDKnmyr7dYNXW y5GCvT8ffexgQSxw08PeslTq8H6qXYpyAstk43+vFnLuoVK2jchEkK1HLt2GQhKvaIlr bsKA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533e8ez7KAOSaQVuc3cphsCPBKkesaidB1s7HRAV3b6E6X9XBSVf tNi9/aWnqMmkoj9O+t61W3+8Mv3Qe/Rx+TsiQgs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwEreXpxIjt6ellYBM7s5qQiD1dWHRVxYbASmx1k/UYO8g79zT/fl+rQXOLEeELCxj15CV+eEVabwm4J51SWvo=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:8a41:: with SMTP id gx1mr13207552ejc.507.1631888659382; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 07:24:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <03b5ea0e-cf1a-8edf-d642-2fb4b2e458fd@htt-consult.com> <CACsn0ckZbA4=Xe+Lc1w5bc5os8Ekeh9q7AAxknknwrrBZ0R-KQ@mail.gmail.com> <E0D027B0-089E-4402-BD65-38ADEABC3351@ll.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <E0D027B0-089E-4402-BD65-38ADEABC3351@ll.mit.edu>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 07:24:07 -0700
Message-ID: <CACsn0ckJJ5jsd9ARYPXHb=0ktLyHQAEJAgpiwCHXT7P+fszFmg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL" <uri@ll.mit.edu>
Cc: Robert Moskowitz <rgm-sec@htt-consult.com>, "<cfrg@ietf.org>" <cfrg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/RiaZ8VN3qhjzmXRSstxeGDzCtHo>
Subject: Re: [CFRG] Please review draft-ietf-drip-rid
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 14:24:23 -0000

On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 7:21 AM Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
<uri@ll.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> I have not read the draft, but my answer to Watson is - because there is not enough room for Post-Quantum certificates, and Ed25519 is not an acceptable alternative for some of us.

ECDSA takes the same place, and unless I'm missing something this
scheme isn't post-quantum either. In fact this proposal can only use
Ed25519 unless I'm misreading it.

>
> --
> Regards,
> Uri



-- 
Astra mortemque praestare gradatim