Re: [Cfrg] Requesting removal of CFRG co-chair

Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com> Sat, 28 December 2013 09:05 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir@checkpoint.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FBA51AE8DB for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 01:05:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.439
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.439 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZdNHVReuUj5l for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 01:05:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.checkpoint.com (smtp.checkpoint.com [194.29.34.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C291AE8D2 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 01:05:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([194.29.34.147]) by smtp.checkpoint.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rBS94saU020129; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 11:04:55 +0200
X-CheckPoint: {52BE8FAB-0-1B221DC2-1FFFF}
Received: from DAG-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([169.254.3.77]) by IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([169.254.2.82]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 11:04:54 +0200
From: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
To: Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>
Thread-Topic: [Cfrg] Requesting removal of CFRG co-chair
Thread-Index: AQHO/Z0GA3BlhF+KHU6H6qtjm4+BSppisTAAgAByKICAAHCEgIAACKEAgAAO6wCAAAbQgIAAFKaAgAAA6wCABJilgIAANQ+AgAClgAA=
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 09:04:54 +0000
Message-ID: <FF493775-FC4D-4055-AFB3-EA0617CBBAFA@checkpoint.com>
References: <CAGZ8ZG2f9QHX40RcB8aajWvEfG0Gh_uewu2Rq7bQGHYNx6cOmw@mail.gmail.com> <52B91820.9090706@cisco.com> <CAGZ8ZG02+o=Qm0gUQiVF9H_=wfn+wQt8ahY1ntLHNsELXbvtVg@mail.gmail.com> <AA79A33E-D6B9-4693-A670-B4458011B394@cisco.com> <CA+cU71mTCVHAe2a46USJihr9ihPVw_vQTu0xk-mpRp41La88Xg@mail.gmail.com> <e4054b534e308e3c17c22ccf987d3edc.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <52B9EFBD.3030607@streamsec.se> <b50dd3dbb915affdb4bfbd13b4399693.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <B1141097-E3C7-485F-B719-1BA5AA0DDD06@checkpoint.com> <bee2b54d6a71371a3ca66e47c1bdd9bf.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <80e37e621408caf49bd4e6ae666736f4.squirrel@www.trepanning.net>
In-Reply-To: <80e37e621408caf49bd4e6ae666736f4.squirrel@www.trepanning.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.31.21.90]
x-kse-antivirus-interceptor-info: protection disabled
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <B198056E6129244A99C6724DF7BB2677@ad.checkpoint.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<henrick@streamsec.se>" <henrick@streamsec.se>, "<cfrg@irtf.org>" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Requesting removal of CFRG co-chair
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 09:05:03 -0000

On Dec 28, 2013, at 1:12 AM, Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>;
 wrote:

> 
>  Yoav, Henrick (and probably others),
> 
>  It has been pointed out to me in private email that this sentence is
> quite ambiguous:
> 
>>>>> On 2013-12-24 21:09, Dan Harkins wrote:
>>>>>>  Realize too that had Kevin's employer not given these people the
>>>>>> opportunity to strike their fashionable pose there would be no
>>>>>> discussion
>>>>>> of IRTF process or what the CFRG's place in the world is.
> 
>  I meant that Kevin's employer presented a convenient (and fashionably
> popular) target to criticize. I did not mean that his employer was doing
> anything to create the environment in which people can comfortably (or
> fashionably) criticize.
> 
>  Hope this clears it up.

It does. Thanks

Yoav