IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cfrg] No CFRG meeting in Honolulu

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 13 October 2014 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE741A1B46 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 09:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KP4wGEtp99Uo for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 09:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D3BE1A1B45 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 09:41:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9DGfbKN013200; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 18:41:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.217.113] (p54893EA6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.137.62.166]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F201F5B8; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 18:41:36 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CACsn0c=P7r4y6KswCoDKCJWqmycv_FHz7g-imesw8iMfF+tiWA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 18:41:35 +0200
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 434911294.925013-80159c19f86bfbd3ee9936b6704f6e66
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F9A313E5-BDA4-4DBC-914A-E8AEF8ACE09C@tzi.org>
References: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739439BB0974B@TK5EX14MBXC286.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <543BFCA9.6070509@isode.com> <CAMm+Lwg8MKbKNufUU+n+Uq941DRy-Q31om9w=AuvE-NhRj8OMg@mail.gmail.com> <CACsn0c=P7r4y6KswCoDKCJWqmycv_FHz7g-imesw8iMfF+tiWA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/SdY0bLUS8rDJCg-anVKhKVGV-UQ
Cc: cfrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] No CFRG meeting in Honolulu
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 16:41:46 -0000

> What more needs to be said? The costs and benefits of the various options have been outlined at length. As far as I can tell, we're waiting on a decision. 

That now is the strongest possible reason to have a face-to-face meeting.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email