Re: [Cfrg] What crypto algorithm is referenced most in RFCs?

David McGrew <mcgrew@cisco.com> Tue, 21 June 2011 20:15 UTC

Return-Path: <mcgrew@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34EA211E809B for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:15:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0iW6lC6BSfjD for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:15:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C71EE11E807A for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:15:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=mcgrew@cisco.com; l=6538; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1308687303; x=1309896903; h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:mime-version:subject: date:references; bh=A5VBpbsy78zMBva4Jt56vEI9mOX1L1DermHN8lEY1SM=; b=JbcMAzy8KH5yxdzG7D4ggs6VlAMcDtATgdDV2MsaksTrM2RX2Se+9+2R VD5+0wY/COH+uWW8PY34ZTet5g35f/YL8p/Q2wEtGEh9bFS6YIBEYQvhs imCmpaNtekgnLZsHAQZR2uu5xs2CV9s9ORDyPYiBotexiIz6qhW28G7ba s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqkFAGP7AE6rRDoG/2dsb2JhbABUnnMBiAZ3iHOhLJ4xhioEhyKKRJAm
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.65,402,1304294400"; d="scan'208,217"; a="466462306"
Received: from mtv-core-1.cisco.com ([171.68.58.6]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Jun 2011 20:15:03 +0000
Received: from stealth-10-32-254-213.cisco.com (stealth-10-32-254-213.cisco.com [10.32.254.213]) by mtv-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p5LKF2RG012966; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:15:02 GMT
Message-Id: <D4C0F99E-CFA6-4143-A044-33D1DDD359A9@cisco.com>
From: David McGrew <mcgrew@cisco.com>
To: Marshall Eubanks <marshall.eubanks@gmail.com>, Joachim@strombergson.com
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTin+zWUpQPh41hSX0jKoH=QYFJo2XQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-287--332380100
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:15:01 -0700
References: <4A7C9D3B-70C6-4D14-A5D8-F54D84DBBEA9@cisco.com> <4DF6FCAD.1000704@Strombergson.com> <4DF7E236.3060603@ieca.com> <CF0765AF-383F-423F-A8CC-10AEB4A3E348@callas.org> <4DF8627B.1030702@Strombergson.com> <74993A34-C2B3-4FA9-B27B-557AD0E3F7BB@cisco.com> <DD276523-6F9F-466E-BC85-CD9887920E6E@cisco.com> <6679410D-BF1F-4FE4-95DB-90E542CDBBD9@cs.tcd.ie> <BANLkTinJaBzm5wWTcJW1ArF8F-O78HLGKw@mail.gmail.com> <D256DDF2-6E11-4322-91B2-3F052DB52FE3@cs.tcd.ie> <BANLkTimyLVpTNcB8BoMFgjyfa23ikbt_gQ@mail.gmail.com> <4DFD0C1B.6070909@cs.tcd.ie> <BF2B2DDA-08DD-4915-9E69-F7E83BB8D728@cisco.com> <4DFF7590.2060009@Strombergson.com> <BANLkTin+zWUpQPh41hSX0jKoH=QYFJo2XQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: cfrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] What crypto algorithm is referenced most in RFCs?
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:15:05 -0000

Joachim, Marshall, many thanks for volunteering.   How about we  
discuss offline how to divide up the work?  (I'm willing to put in  
some time too.)

David

On Jun 20, 2011, at 10:18 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:

>
>
> 2011/6/20 Joachim Strömbergson <Joachim@strombergson.com>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Aloha!
>
> On 2011:06:20 17:23, David McGrew wrote:
> > There are about 120 00-version drafts that reference crypto  
> currently.
> > Most of those are doing the right thing, and won't require much if  
> any
> > work from crypto-reviewers.   This suggests that the "steady state"
> > workload of having CFRG review the uses of crypto in new I-Ds will  
> be
> > manageable, if we can get a couple of volunteers.  There are also  
> 170
> > current I-Ds that mention MD5, which suggests that the short-term
> > workload will be higher than the steady state workload.  If anyone  
> is
> > interested, please send a note either to the list, or to Stephen,  
> Sean,
> > and me.
>
> Since I'm the one who brought this up I guess I should also step up to
> the plank. ;-) Count me in.
>
> I will volunteer too.
>
> Marshall
>
>
>
> - --
> Med vänlig hälsning, Yours
>
> Joachim Strömbergson - Alltid i harmonisk svängning.
> = 
> = 
> ======================================================================
> Kryptoblog - IT-säkerhet på svenska
> http://www.strombergson.com/kryptoblog
> = 
> = 
> ======================================================================
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk3/dZAACgkQZoPr8HT30QG3oQCfSj3ndD8lAU5xMnTBZ1QcxfgJ
> G5wAmwYUyKck3zZXhy8DdIWathWLJi+u
> =pfjM
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> Cfrg mailing list
> Cfrg@irtf.org
> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cfrg mailing list
> Cfrg@irtf.org
> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg