Re: [Cfrg] Call for adoption: Threshold Signatures

Nick Sullivan transcribed 2.9K bytes:
> Dear CFRG participants,
> 
> After some active conversations on the mailing list, there seems to be
> support for taking on work related to threshold signatures at the CFRG.
> This email commences a 3-week call for adoption for the topic of "Threshold
> Signatures" that will end on October 28th, 2020:
> 
> There are two drafts that have been submitted for consideration on this
> topic:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-komlo-frost/
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hallambaker-threshold-sigs/
> 
> Please give your views on the following questions:
> a) should this topic be adopted by the CFRG as a work item, and if so
> b) should one or both of these documents should be considered as a starting
> point for this work
> c) are you willing to help work on this item and/or review it
> 
> Please reply to this email (or in exceptional circumstances, you can email
> CFRG chairs directly at cfrg-chairs@ietf.org)
> 
> Thank you,
> Nick (for the chairs)

> _______________________________________________
> Cfrg mailing list
> Cfrg@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg

Hi all,

I would definitely like to see a standarisation of FROST move forward, since I
already have two clients interested in using it, and I have a Rust
implementation in progress here: https://github.com/isislovecruft/frost-dalek
(If you grep for "[CFRG]" there's a few comments on things that I suspect might
be useful to specify in a standard.)

To that end, I'm happy to help the authors with both working on the draft and
review.

Best regards,
-- 
 ♥Ⓐ isis agora lovecruft
_________________________________________________________
OpenPGP: 4096R/0A6A58A14B5946ABDE18E207A3ADB67A2CDB8B35
Current Keys: https://fyb.patternsinthevoid.net/isis.txt