Re: [Cfrg] A2 versus A^2 and BB verus AA

Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org> Sat, 10 January 2015 21:09 UTC

Return-Path: <alangley@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DDAD1A87DF for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 13:09:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tM5yIJGy4Luy for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 13:09:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-x235.google.com (mail-la0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74FA31A0406 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 13:09:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-la0-f53.google.com with SMTP id gm9so19667645lab.12 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 13:09:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=q1ceCifw9Qo6hkF8nRygB8GyY4MzLlNrZUTCmKC4xA4=; b=MH1letsxPmCXRNAvrORsHj2vEMMi+HrnBHuAhmIdHITVcIRo9K50ybOFKXHmoTzwRz QIVgibCdFFQUq/KNUZaOsjJKPe844CjmDDeWHDoO9kNCAchKRW5+EfGM04U2OS/w9nmC rLMm5a16vZW+Bes596AFnk+BzxrFrO3AvmaiLz/5+yCTcccQtW/pbAJB2w7fGuQVKXox Cmy+X88YIto92Xylkn4SLjfVAgwbcQE1hQEwfBOPwxEes9Zu6gaPQqU7vZ3Rl55REn0q gb9EiZB6kdM/Ek9OL5D/Rl7Ccv1mE4VjCpc3X3l7TysqWmwKJMMdJ2KfdNHjeKo5MBLA oIzA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.62.194 with SMTP id a2mr28768789lbs.73.1420924192855; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 13:09:52 -0800 (PST)
Sender: alangley@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.114.225 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 13:09:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20150110204227.GF11760@cph.win.tue.nl>
References: <D0D6B088.5815C%paul@marvell.com> <CAMfhd9XTQB-QjMpkW9PQ1e7NaV5jc56KfRP12i6WLaiNGqUyRg@mail.gmail.com> <20150110204227.GF11760@cph.win.tue.nl>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 13:09:52 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ZNMX81LiLsmwxx4z1Icx1UEGoQs
Message-ID: <CAMfhd9X7BLhL=n2LtMkAKHqbWLwDZcuneGuM1Hd_r2bh1zJaRA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org>
To: Tanja Lange <tanja@hyperelliptic.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/YO20KLAqpidlU86NBqqgQzBhCxs>
Cc: "simon@josefsson.org" <simon@josefsson.org>, "mpg@elzevir.fr" <mpg@elzevir.fr>, "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>, "agl@google.com" <agl@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] A2 versus A^2 and BB verus AA
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 21:09:56 -0000

On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Tanja Lange <tanja@hyperelliptic.org> wrote:
> This is not a typo, it is using a different (better) definition
> of the curve constant which is what the implementations use.

Thanks both. I've replaced that change with a TODO to note why the
formula will differ from EFD.


Cheers

AGL

-- 
Adam Langley agl@imperialviolet.org https://www.imperialviolet.org