Re: [CFRG] draft-irtf-cfrg-vrf-08 research group last call (RGLC)

Nick Sullivan <> Thu, 02 September 2021 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 666013A1734 for <>; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 09:41:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.499, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Th6yb0fbR-Oq for <>; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 09:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AAED3A16FE for <>; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 09:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id x137so2051263vsx.1 for <>; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 09:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WRNbLK6ULrD5fjYs4hXZObA02eNbzr+TO/2R93jr4kw=; b=SjEQBQOeiNHEbPYdqs2b9MfyJFWjbXZLiD5svXV3+nKdBYk6SaWbM54jNBDW2lPtFK QjtjaucnI1QXE1STuaMlg5M8kk9gDHW6g35+qIg7QQggD3wMTaei4osVZQuIAFGbckW9 3Sd2tOicRT5MjsEhPCEPiGvwXdOD1THU8OY+0=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WRNbLK6ULrD5fjYs4hXZObA02eNbzr+TO/2R93jr4kw=; b=IU294gBRf/OBw44/20FzIaF2CZieJ47vT7ORgVIVscg5y+hZlhwpJZScM1cNQH02jW 1TVDvVkre+PxFFh1vVc/Fphk0tQtI9u5/uhZ1nbqTnDBmu+m+7RdTmtWzCUhhyARlV0Y ENRfUo+IOnQQe6x/y9IdPBjgDBS3Iq+R4ATycoWmRGEzmw8uU5SJwD13111CIFEhXxnM 7P3DwLlI125IZ0OlxzQ9U1f3R3oi1CQwMM5bDddW/wP5kMUDJEt7KsTBjJUGMgh3YLZD eKxo/+N/WvJEQu2CwrnMbjgRnBMGa6FEzg4zzwFWgVtf66RnuJ1Zuv17cAfSMNkTtu7/ qaPw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531t5/PCbw7jVCRCOJ9tk6mkqdCZ6fHD74dEupitI6Wshc938s9U 0rvssKvLYdv4Jp7XtFzmrTsyG/UbOAzfwFY0EF8Kekga6KI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyU20j2f4dgzkkwwKinYiBePSAqJjs98pPtk9AqNnjr5fj83Dwd7XyQMp1dmImGbXt/7X/VxdPDEmO158apwc0=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:f793:: with SMTP id j19mr3056302vso.28.1630600911373; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 09:41:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Nick Sullivan <>
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 12:41:35 -0400
Message-ID: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [CFRG] draft-irtf-cfrg-vrf-08 research group last call (RGLC)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 16:42:13 -0000

Dear CFRG participants,

This RGLC was inconclusive since there was only one reply supportive
of the document. We request that any participants who are interested
in this document please take another look and send a review to the
list. If there's enough interest, we will open up a second RGLC for
this document.

Thank you,
Nick (for the chairs)

On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 12:09 PM Nick Sullivan <> wrote:
> Dear CFRG participants,
> The VRF draft has received significant reviews from the RG and the crypto panel and is ready for last call. This email commences a 2-week last call for this document that will end on Feburary 23, 2021:
> If you've read the document by the end of this period and think that it is ready (or not ready) for publication as an RFC, please send a message in reply to this email. Detailed comments would be helpful. You can reach out directly to CFRG chairs ( if you have questions about process.
> Thank you,
> Nick & Stanislav & Alexey