IETF Logo Mail Archive

[CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live?

Frank Denis <cfrg@pureftpd.org> Fri, 20 September 2024 10:46 UTC

Return-Path: <cfrg@pureftpd.org>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC7AC15155C for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 03:46:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pureftpd.org; domainkeys=pass (2048-bit key) header.from=cfrg@pureftpd.org header.d=pureftpd.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CfFae1L_V_uO for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 03:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-uk.mx.c9x.org (mailout-uk.mx.c9x.org [137.74.223.233]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80786C151084 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 03:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from msync.c9x.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msync.c9x.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id a70bce1f for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 12:46:19 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pureftpd.org; h=from :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject :date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; s=selector1; bh=iazc w+XmYu+4doHtsDnGUMt8Mo0=; b=bGS0qGNGr1woj3ck4J3jRe/3Xy4V+EgE6oWW z5UqeBeeaegV/G3dxoesEfy8LF5rUb1Ve35yAvMeaO9rlCWZTpnFD2HVO+c0B+qC 5VqtLjpsAqZsp+jWcoTkMtD0BEag2890atzKq//7CiwvmwlubstQNjz9Il3Y6d6t SObHwlcGvqMnOj1aPdioof24qXHU5y5q4R1dJs+8hm6/C1vqM5tGBxJc2M4Et/78 xFQTNSTM6OgWaIIbarQmMovoBk2lNG8BG6fy0UupJpCd8ChHsHhG4IPy7GxkEUFn 1yZhNRJ+V/b5I+JbK2dc4WCtynQBQ9V3ZpjA60Ly2KEp1hyIAA==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pureftpd.org; h=from :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject :date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; q=dns; s=selector1; b= nBZZoPrQ8D1aG/ictAurdiFCf7ApHjppgZWqQtrtRxJ6ksivJyigEDCalLczLvVw 6QNvz1nzoOUhMUUkR0EMkLVfc7zIVVTr59jILFvF0SjTGm+KDnFEjRI8apAdtT0I 7DARKgray8FSM72qm8+cS4zIWb5RT/g15pyLosXTtw0t1QOEU2TOhC/+1a7T1rPp kHuj93QCG+EmqK9zk8KofwXdrC/4MbTJDK5zSOB/+xlMeQhZAp6A7McsaYAaO3us TE6UprFmSdpnWOKQLI4IuB6jltehY+LBsbfPT5M+EI1prphVzjPlZjTDhwj9/p1f mId4k0vuengkyZYuSuxPgQ==
Received: from smtpclient.apple (nogent.c9x.org [82.66.97.28]) by premiere.mx.c9x.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 269446d1 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 12:46:19 +0200 (CEST)
From: Frank Denis <cfrg@pureftpd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3818.100.11.1.3\))
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 12:45:59 +0200
References: <CAG2Zi20N98cxpgjfRe6gWw1SQEoux+5P3NhLBFUfUHk_udYeFg@mail.gmail.com> <CAN8C-_KDTg2ZatR7tf0K9e19Xz24CrMF06_vB8fc0ZioqZ+oeA@mail.gmail.com>
To: CFRG <cfrg@irtf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAN8C-_KDTg2ZatR7tf0K9e19Xz24CrMF06_vB8fc0ZioqZ+oeA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <BF349DA5-981E-4B06-83B7-8C6654D7F64B@pureftpd.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3818.100.11.1.3)
Message-ID-Hash: 52YRFDSS6WKO2LEL2IQERXVBKHAP7HG7
X-Message-ID-Hash: 52YRFDSS6WKO2LEL2IQERXVBKHAP7HG7
X-MailFrom: cfrg@pureftpd.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-cfrg.irtf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live?
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/ZgAww3fPS_wC0iTfdn4Pkddxels>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:cfrg-owner@irtf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cfrg-join@irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cfrg-leave@irtf.org>

Hi Ori,

This is very good idea.

And if files are hosted in Git, publishing the hash is not even necessary, as the URI can directly represent a specific revision.

-Frank.

> On Sep 20, 2024, at 03:03, Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries> wrote:
> 
> I would want to ensure that the references made in RFCs are not changed after publication.
> 
> You could consider publishing the hash of the files along with the references in an appendix.
> 
> Hosting the files in a version control system and referencing them that way seems like the least effort.

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status